这是我使用的将来模式:(https://github.com/Smallscript-Corp)

启用同步和异步fn使用 使事件模式与异步行为统一

class XPromise extends Promise {
  state = 'pending'
  get settled() {return(this.state !== 'pending')}
  resolve(v,...a) {
    this.state = 'resolved'
    return(this.resolve_(this.value = v,...a))
  }
  reject(e,...a) {
    this.state = 'rejected'
    return(this.reject_(this.value = (e instanceof Error) ? e : XPromise.Error(e),...a))
  }
  static Error(e) {const v = Error('value-rejected'); v.value = e; return(v)}
  static Future(fn,...args) { // FactoryFn
    let r,t,fv = new XPromise((r_,t_) => {r=r_;t=t_})
    fv.resolve_ = r; fv.reject_  = t;
    switch(typeof fn) {
      case 'undefined': break; case 'function': fn(fv,...args); break;
      default: fv.resolve(fn)
    }
    return(fv)
  }
}
global.Future = XPromise.Future

然后你可以创建可以使用同步和异步函数来解决的未来价值实例;支持统一处理事件。

你可以用它来写一个像这样的模式:

async doSomething() {
  // Start both - logically async-parallel
  const fvIsNetworkOnLine = this.fvIsNetworkOnline
  const fvAuthToken = this.fvAuthToken
  // await both (order not critical since both started/queued above)
  await fvAuthToken
  await fvIsNetworkOnLine
  // ... we can check the future values here if needed `fv.resolved`, `fv.state` etc
  // ... do dependent workflow here ...
}
onNetworkOnLine(fIsOnline) {
  // We utilize the `fv.settled` below, and use the event to `settle` it etc
  if(fIsOnline) {
    if(this.fvNetworkAvailable_)
      this.fvNetworkAvailable_.resolve(true)
    this.fvNetworkAvailable_ = undefined
  }
  else if(this.fvNetworkAvailable_.settled) {
    this.fvNetworkAvailable_ = undefined
  }
}
get fvNetworkAvailable() {
  if(navigator.onLine)
    return true
  else if(this.fvNetworkAvailable_)
    return this.fvNetworkAvailable_
  return (this.fvNetworkAvailable_ = Future())
}
get fvAuthToken() {
  if(this.fvAuthToken_)
    return this.fvAuthToken_
  const authTokenFv = async fv => {
    // ... handle retry logic etc here ...
  }
  return(this.fvAuthToken_ = Future(authTokenFv))
}

这里是一个更充实的QueryablePromise的es6版本，允许在第一次解析后进行链接和捕获，并立即解析或拒绝以保持api与本机Promise一致。

const PROMISE = Symbol('PROMISE') const tap = fn => x => (fn(x), x) const trace = label => tap(x => console.log(label, x)) class QueryablePromise { resolved = false rejected = false fulfilled = false catchFns = [] constructor(fn) { this[PROMISE] = new Promise(fn) .then(tap(() => { this.fulfilled = true this.resolved = true })) .catch(x => { this.fulfilled = true this.rejected = true return Promise.reject(x) }) } then(fn) { this[PROMISE].then(fn) return this } catch(fn) { this[PROMISE].catch(fn) return this } static resolve(x) { return new QueryablePromise((res) => res(x)) } static reject(x) { return new QueryablePromise((_, rej) => rej(x)) } } const resolvedPromise = new QueryablePromise((res) => { setTimeout(res, 200, 'resolvedPromise') }) const rejectedPromise = new QueryablePromise((_, rej) => { setTimeout(rej, 200, 'rejectedPromise') }) // ensure our promises have not been fulfilled console.log('test 1 before: is resolved', resolvedPromise.resolved) console.log('test 2 before: is rejected', rejectedPromise.rejected) setTimeout(() => { // check to see the resolved status of our promise console.log('test 1 after: is resolved', resolvedPromise.resolved) console.log('test 2 after: is rejected', rejectedPromise.rejected) }, 300) // make sure we can immediately resolve a QueryablePromise const immediatelyResolvedPromise = QueryablePromise.resolve('immediatelyResolvedPromise') // ensure we can chain then .then(trace('test 3 resolved')) .then(trace('test 3 resolved 2')) .catch(trace('test 3 rejected')) // make sure we can immediately reject a QueryablePromise const immediatelyRejectedPromise = QueryablePromise.reject('immediatelyRejectedPromise') .then(trace('test 4 resolved')) .catch(trace('test 4 rejected')) <script src="https://codepen.io/synthet1c/pen/KyQQmL.js"></script>

更新:2019

Bluebird.js提供了这个:http://bluebirdjs.com/docs/api/isfulfilled.html

var Promise = require("bluebird");
let p = Promise.resolve();
console.log(p.isFulfilled());

如果您更喜欢创建自己的包装器，这里有一个关于它的不错的博客。

因为JavaScript是单线程的，所以很难找到一个足够常见的用例来证明将其放在规范中是正确的。知道承诺是否被解决的最佳位置是在.then()中。测试Promise是否被履行将创建一个轮询循环，这很可能是错误的方向。

如果你想同步推理异步代码，Async /await是一个很好的结构。

await this();
await that();
return 'success!';

另一个有用的调用是Promise.all()

var promise1 = Promise.resolve(3);
var promise2 = 42;
var promise3 = new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
  setTimeout(resolve, 100, 'foo');
});

Promise.all([promise1, promise2, promise3]).then(function(values) {
  console.log(values);
});
// expected output: Array [3, 42, "foo"]

当我第一次得到这个答案时，这就是我正在寻找的用例。

你能做的就是使用一个变量来存储状态，手动将状态设置为那个变量，然后检查那个变量。

var state = 'pending';

new Promise(function(ff, rjc) {
  //do something async

  if () {//if success
    state = 'resolved';

    ff();//
  } else {
    state = 'rejected';

    rjc();
  }
});

console.log(state);//check the state somewhere else in the code

当然，这意味着您必须能够访问承诺的原始代码。如果你没有，那么你可以这样做:

var state = 'pending';

//you can't access somePromise's code
somePromise.then(function(){
  state = 'resolved';
}, function() {
  state = 'rejected';
})

console.log(state);//check the promise's state somewhere else in the code

我的解决方案是编写更多的代码，但我认为您可能不必对使用的每个承诺都这样做。

警告:process.binding(“跑龙套”)。节点16上的getPromiseDetails未定义!

基准:

候选人:

/**
 * https://stackoverflow.com/a/47009572/5318303
 */
const isPromisePending1 = (() => { // noinspection JSUnresolvedFunction
    const util = process.binding('util')  // noinspection JSUnresolvedFunction
    return promise => !util.getPromiseDetails(promise)[0]
})()

/**
 * https://stackoverflow.com/a/35852666/5318303
 */
const isPromisePending2 = (promise) => util.inspect(promise) === 'Promise { <pending> }'

/**
 * https://stackoverflow.com/a/35820220/5318303
 */
const isPromisePending3 = (promise) => {
    const t = {}
    return Promise.race([promise, t])
            .then(v => v === t, () => false)
}

测试的承诺:

const a = Promise.resolve()
const b = Promise.reject()
const c = new Promise(() => {})
const x = (async () => 1)()

运行基准:

const n = 1000000

console.time('isPromisePending1')
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    isPromisePending1(a)
    isPromisePending1(b)
    isPromisePending1(c)
    isPromisePending1(x)
}
console.timeEnd('isPromisePending1')

console.time('isPromisePending2')
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    isPromisePending2(a)
    isPromisePending2(b)
    isPromisePending2(c)
    isPromisePending2(x)
}
console.timeEnd('isPromisePending2')

console.time('isPromisePending3')
for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    await isPromisePending3(a)
    await isPromisePending3(b)
    await isPromisePending3(c)
    await isPromisePending3(x)
}
console.timeEnd('isPromisePending3')

结果:

isPromisePending1: 440.694ms
isPromisePending2: 3.354s
isPromisePending3: 4.761s

显然isPromisePending1()太快了(8~10倍)!但它在节点16上不可用!(见上述警告)。

对于原生JavaScript承诺，不存在这样的同步检查API。用本土的承诺是不可能做到的。规范没有指定这样的方法。

用户域库可以做到这一点，如果你的目标是一个特定的引擎(比如v8)，并且可以访问平台代码(也就是说，你可以在核心中编写代码)，那么你可以使用特定的工具(比如私有符号)来实现这一点。这是非常具体的，但不是在用户领域。