奇怪但事实是:如果可以接受(即result为void并且你不介意让runloop循环一次)，添加一个延迟，即使这是零:

[_controller performSelector:NSSelectorFromString(@"someMethod")
    withObject:nil
    afterDelay:0];

这删除了警告，大概是因为它向编译器保证没有对象可以返回，并且在某种程度上管理不当。

我没有使用块方法，这给我带来了一些问题:

    IMP imp = [_controller methodForSelector:selector];
    void (*func)(id, SEL) = (void *)imp;

我将使用NSInvocation，像这样:

    -(void) sendSelectorToDelegate:(SEL) selector withSender:(UIButton *)button 

    if ([delegate respondsToSelector:selector])
    {
    NSMethodSignature * methodSignature = [[delegate class]
                                    instanceMethodSignatureForSelector:selector];
    NSInvocation * delegateInvocation = [NSInvocation
                                   invocationWithMethodSignature:methodSignature];


    [delegateInvocation setSelector:selector];
    [delegateInvocation setTarget:delegate];

    // remember the first two parameter are cmd and self
    [delegateInvocation setArgument:&button atIndex:2];
    [delegateInvocation invoke];
    }

在Xcode 4.2的LLVM 3.0编译器中，你可以像下面这样抑制警告:

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    [self.ticketTarget performSelector: self.ticketAction withObject: self];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop

如果你在几个地方得到错误，并且想要使用C宏系统来隐藏指令，你可以定义一个宏来更容易地抑制警告:

#define SuppressPerformSelectorLeakWarning(Stuff) \
    do { \
        _Pragma("clang diagnostic push") \
        _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Warc-performSelector-leaks\"") \
        Stuff; \
        _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop") \
    } while (0)

你可以像这样使用宏:

SuppressPerformSelectorLeakWarning(
    [_target performSelector:_action withObject:self]
);

如果你需要执行消息的结果，你可以这样做:

id result;
SuppressPerformSelectorLeakWarning(
    result = [_target performSelector:_action withObject:self]
);

不要压制警告!

有不少于12个可选的解决方案来修补编译器。 虽然在第一次实现时你很聪明，但地球上很少有工程师能追随你的脚步，而这段代码最终会崩溃。

安全的路线:

所有这些解决方案都是可行的，只是在一定程度上与您的初衷有所不同。假设param可以为nil:

安全路线，相同的概念行为:

// GREAT
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES];
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES];
[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:YES modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

安全路线，行为稍有不同:

(见此回复) 使用任何线程代替[NSThread主线程]。

// GOOD
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument afterDelay:0];
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument afterDelay:0 inModes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO];
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO];
[_controller performSelectorOnMainThread:selector withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

[_controller performSelectorInBackground:selector withObject:anArgument];

[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO];
[_controller performSelector:selector onThread:[NSThread mainThread] withObject:anArgument waitUntilDone:NO modes:@[(__bridge NSString *)kCFRunLoopDefaultMode]];

危险的路线

需要某种编译器静音，这是必然的破坏。请注意，目前，它确实在Swift中中断了。

// AT YOUR OWN RISK
[_controller performSelector:selector];
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument];
[_controller performSelector:selector withObject:anArgument withObject:nil];

Matt Galloway的回答解释了原因:

考虑以下几点: id anotherObject1 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(copy)]; id anotherObject2 = [someObject performSelector:@selector(giveMeAnotherNonRetainedObject)]; 现在，ARC如何知道第一个返回一个保留计数为1的对象，而第二个 返回一个自动释放的对象?

如果您忽略了返回值，那么抑制警告似乎通常是安全的。如果你真的需要从performSelector获取一个保留对象，我不确定最好的做法是什么——除了“不要这样做”。

@c-road在这里提供了正确的问题描述链接。下面您可以看到我的示例，当performSelector导致内存泄漏时。

@interface Dummy : NSObject <NSCopying>
@end

@implementation Dummy

- (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone {
  return [[Dummy alloc] init];
}

- (id)clone {
  return [[Dummy alloc] init];
}

@end

void CopyDummy(Dummy *dummy) {
  __unused Dummy *dummyClone = [dummy copy];
}

void CloneDummy(Dummy *dummy) {
  __unused Dummy *dummyClone = [dummy clone];
}

void CopyDummyWithLeak(Dummy *dummy, SEL copySelector) {
  __unused Dummy *dummyClone = [dummy performSelector:copySelector];
}

void CloneDummyWithoutLeak(Dummy *dummy, SEL cloneSelector) {
  __unused Dummy *dummyClone = [dummy performSelector:cloneSelector];
}

int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
  @autoreleasepool {
    Dummy *dummy = [[Dummy alloc] init];
    for (;;) { @autoreleasepool {
      //CopyDummy(dummy);
      //CloneDummy(dummy);
      //CloneDummyWithoutLeak(dummy, @selector(clone));
      CopyDummyWithLeak(dummy, @selector(copy));
      [NSThread sleepForTimeInterval:1];
    }} 
  }
  return 0;
}

在我的例子中，唯一导致内存泄漏的方法是CopyDummyWithLeak。原因是ARC不知道，copySelector返回retain object。

如果你运行内存泄漏工具，你可以看到下面的图片: .．.在其他任何情况下都没有内存泄漏: