我做了一个名为manual-promise的库，它的功能是替换Promise的drop。这里的其他答案都不能作为Promise的替代品，因为它们使用代理或包装器。

纱线添加手工承诺

NPN安装手动承诺

import { ManualPromise } from "manual-promise";

const prom = new ManualPromise();

prom.resolve(2);

// actions can still be run inside the promise
const prom2 = new ManualPromise((resolve, reject) => {
    // ... code
});


new ManualPromise() instanceof Promise === true

https://github.com/zpxp/manual-promise#readme

首先在浏览器或节点上启用——allow-native -syntax

const p = new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
    if (someCondition){
        resolve();
    } else {
        reject();
    } 
});

onClick = function () {
    %ResolvePromise(p, value)
}

您可以将Promise包装在一个类中。

class Deferred {
    constructor(handler) {
        this.promise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            this.reject = reject;
            this.resolve = resolve;
            handler(resolve, reject);
        });

        this.promise.resolve = this.resolve;
        this.promise.reject = this.reject;

        return this.promise;
    }
    promise;
    resolve;
    reject;
}

// How to use.
const promise = new Deferred((resolve, reject) => {
  // Use like normal Promise.
});

promise.resolve(); // Resolve from any context.

不，没有其他方法可以做到这一点——我唯一能说的是这个用例不是很常见。就像Felix在评论中说的那样——你所做的将始终有效。

值得一提的是，promise构造函数以这种方式运行的原因是抛出安全——如果当你的代码在promise构造函数中运行时发生了你没有预料到的异常，它将变成拒绝，这种形式的抛出安全——将抛出的错误转换为拒绝是很重要的，有助于维护可预测的代码。

出于这个抛出安全的原因，承诺构造函数被选择而不是延迟(延迟是一种允许你正在做的事情的替代承诺构造方法)——至于最佳实践——我将传递元素并使用承诺构造函数:

var p = new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
    this.onclick = resolve;
}.bind(this));

出于这个原因——只要可以使用promise构造函数而不是导出函数——我建议您使用它。无论何时你可以避免两者，避免两者和链。

注意，你永远不应该在if(condition)这样的情况下使用promise构造函数，第一个例子可以这样写:

var p = Promise[(someCondition)?"resolve":"reject"]();

有点晚了，但另一种方法是使用Deferred对象。你基本上有相同数量的样板文件，但是如果你想要传递它们并且可能在它们的定义之外解析，这很方便。

天真的实现:

class Deferred {
  constructor() {
    this.promise = new Promise((resolve, reject)=> {
      this.reject = reject
      this.resolve = resolve
    })
  }
}

function asyncAction() {
  var dfd = new Deferred()

  setTimeout(()=> {
    dfd.resolve(42)
  }, 500)

  return dfd.promise
}

asyncAction().then(result => {
  console.log(result) // 42
})

ES5版本:

function Deferred() {
  var self = this;
  this.promise = new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
    self.reject = reject
    self.resolve = resolve
  })
}

function asyncAction() {
  var dfd = new Deferred()

  setTimeout(function() {
    dfd.resolve(42)
  }, 500)

  return dfd.promise
}

asyncAction().then(function(result) {
  console.log(result) // 42
})

我喜欢@JonJaques的回答，但我想更进一步。

如果你绑定并捕获Deferred对象，那么它完全实现了Promise API，你可以将它视为Promise并等待它等等。

⚠️ Editor's Note: I don't recommend this kind of pattern anymore since at the time of writing, Promise.prototype.finally was not a thing yet, then it became a thing… This could happen to other methods so I recommend you augment the promise instance with resolve and reject functions instead: function createDeferredPromise() { let resolve let reject const promise = new Promise((thisResolve, thisReject) => { resolve = thisResolve reject = thisReject }) return Object.assign(promise, {resolve, reject}) } Go upvote someone else's answer.

class DeferredPromise { constructor() { this._promise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => { // assign the resolve and reject functions to `this` // making them usable on the class instance this.resolve = resolve; this.reject = reject; }); // bind `then` and `catch` to implement the same interface as Promise this.then = this._promise.then.bind(this._promise); this.catch = this._promise.catch.bind(this._promise); this.finally = this._promise.finally.bind(this._promise); this[Symbol.toStringTag] = 'Promise'; } } const deferred = new DeferredPromise(); console.log('waiting 2 seconds...'); setTimeout(() => { deferred.resolve('whoa!'); }, 2000); async function someAsyncFunction() { const value = await deferred; console.log(value); } someAsyncFunction();