我一直在使用ES6 Promise。
通常，Promise是这样构造和使用的
new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
if (someCondition){
resolve();
} else {
reject();
}
});
但我一直在做下面这样的事情，为了灵活起见，把决心放在外面。
var outsideResolve;
var outsideReject;
new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
outsideResolve = resolve;
outsideReject = reject;
});
后来
onClick = function(){
outsideResolve();
}
这很好，但是否有更简单的方法来做到这一点?如果不是，这是一个好的实践吗?
当前回答
有点晚了，但另一种方法是使用Deferred对象。你基本上有相同数量的样板文件，但是如果你想要传递它们并且可能在它们的定义之外解析，这很方便。
天真的实现:
class Deferred {
constructor() {
this.promise = new Promise((resolve, reject)=> {
this.reject = reject
this.resolve = resolve
})
}
}
function asyncAction() {
var dfd = new Deferred()
setTimeout(()=> {
dfd.resolve(42)
}, 500)
return dfd.promise
}
asyncAction().then(result => {
console.log(result) // 42
})
ES5版本:
function Deferred() {
var self = this;
this.promise = new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
self.reject = reject
self.resolve = resolve
})
}
function asyncAction() {
var dfd = new Deferred()
setTimeout(function() {
dfd.resolve(42)
}, 500)
return dfd.promise
}
asyncAction().then(function(result) {
console.log(result) // 42
})
其他回答
我们的解决方案是使用闭包来存储解析/拒绝函数，并附加一个函数来扩展承诺本身。
模式如下:
function getPromise() {
var _resolve, _reject;
var promise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
_reject = reject;
_resolve = resolve;
});
promise.resolve_ex = (value) => {
_resolve(value);
};
promise.reject_ex = (value) => {
_reject(value);
};
return promise;
}
使用它:
var promise = getPromise();
promise.then(value => {
console.info('The promise has been fulfilled: ' + value);
});
promise.resolve_ex('hello');
// or the reject version
//promise.reject_ex('goodbye');
简单:
var promiseResolve, promiseReject;
var promise = new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
promiseResolve = resolve;
promiseReject = reject;
});
promiseResolve();
我在2015年为我的框架提出了一个解决方案。我把这种类型的承诺称为任务
function createPromise(handler){
var resolve, reject;
var promise = new Promise(function(_resolve, _reject){
resolve = _resolve;
reject = _reject;
if(handler) handler(resolve, reject);
})
promise.resolve = resolve;
promise.reject = reject;
return promise;
}
// create
var promise = createPromise()
promise.then(function(data){ alert(data) })
// resolve from outside
promise.resolve(200)
helper方法可以减轻这种额外的开销，并给您同样的jQuery感觉。
function Deferred() {
let resolve;
let reject;
const promise = new Promise((res, rej) => {
resolve = res;
reject = rej;
});
return { promise, resolve, reject };
}
用法是
const { promise, resolve, reject } = Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
confirm: resolve,
cancel: reject
});
return promise;
它类似于jQuery
const dfd = $.Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
confirm: dfd.resolve,
cancel: dfd.reject
});
return dfd.promise();
不过，在用例中，这种简单的本机语法就可以了
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
displayConfirmationDialog({
confirm: resolve,
cancel: reject
});
});
我为此写了一个小库。https://www.npmjs.com/package/@inf3rno/promise.exposed
我使用了别人写的工厂方法，但是我也重写了then, catch, finally方法，所以你也可以通过这些方法解决原来的承诺。
在没有外部执行人的情况下解决承诺:
const promise = Promise.exposed().then(console.log);
promise.resolve("This should show up in the console.");
从外部与执行器的setTimeout赛跑:
const promise = Promise.exposed(function (resolve, reject){
setTimeout(function (){
resolve("I almost fell asleep.")
}, 100000);
}).then(console.log);
setTimeout(function (){
promise.resolve("I don't want to wait that much.");
}, 100);
如果你不想污染全局命名空间，有一个无冲突模式:
const createExposedPromise = require("@inf3rno/promise.exposed/noConflict");
const promise = createExposedPromise().then(console.log);
promise.resolve("This should show up in the console.");
