I've been working with a small group of people on a coding project for fun. It's an organized and fairly cohesive group. The people I work with all have various skill sets related to programming, but some of them use older or outright wrong methods, such as excessive global variables, poor naming conventions, and other things. While things work, the implementation is poor. What's a good way to politely ask or introduce them to use better methodology, without it coming across as questioning (or insulting) their experience and/or education?


当前回答

Privately inquire about some of the "bad" code segments with an eye toward the possibility that it is actually reasonable code, (no matter how predisposed you may be), or that there are perhaps extenuating circumstances. If you are still convinced that the code is just plain bad -- and that the source actually is this person -- just go away. One of several things may happen: 1) the person notices and takes some corrective action, 2) the person does nothing (is oblivious, or doesn't care as much as you do).

如果#2发生了,或者从你的角度来看,#1并没有带来足够的改进,并且它正在损害项目,并且/或对你造成了足够的影响,那么可能是时候在团队中开始建立/执行标准了。这需要管理层的支持,但只有从基层做起才最有效。

祝你好运。我能感受到你的痛苦,兄弟。

其他回答

糟糕的命名习惯:总是不可原谅的。

是的,不要总是认为你的方式更好……这可能很困难,但必须保持客观性。

I've had an experience with a coder that had such horrible naming of functions, the code was worse than unreadable. The functions lied about what they did, the code was nonsensical. And they were protective/resistant to having someone else change their code. when confronted very politely, they admitted it was poorly named, but wanted to retain their ownership of the code and would go back and fix it up "at a later date." This is in the past now, but how do you deal with a situation where they error is ACKNOWLEDGED, but then protected? This went on for a long time and I had no idea how to break through that barrier.

Global variables: I myself am not THAT fond of global variables, but I know a few otherwise excellent programmers that like them A LOT. So much so that I've come to believe they are not actually all that bad in many situations, as they allow for clarity, ease of debugging. (please don't flame/downvote me :) ) It comes down to, I've seen a lot of very good, effective, bug free code that used global variables (not put in by me!) and great deal of buggy, impossible to read/maintain/fix code that meticulously used proper patterns. Maybe there IS a place (though shrinking perhaps) for global variables? I'm considering rethinking my position based on evidence.

如果你有一个松散的编码标准,能够指出这一点,或者表明你不能遵循代码,因为它不是正确的格式可能是值得的。

如果您没有编码格式,现在将是一个好时机。类似于这个问题的答案可能会有帮助:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4121/team-coding-styles

这完全取决于你写作的文化。在一个自由软件项目中,你告诉他们他们写的代码不好,并给出积极的建议、改进方法和反馈。你也可以给他们的代码发送一个补丁。

一封友好的电子邮件也不会有什么坏处。

如果可能的话,确保他们明白你是在批评他们的代码,而不是针对他们个人。

重要的是激励和指导人们,即使有人明显犯了错误,也要表现出尊重。但是,不仅要有指导的方法,而且要有说明错误就是错误的方法。糟糕的代码应该做得更好。这不是可选的。从主管的角度来看,员工应该知道哪些代码是可以的,哪些是不可以的。它仍然应该以尊重和激励那些负责任的人来改善。