HashMap, LinkedHashMap和TreeMap在Java中的区别是什么? 我在输出中没有看到任何不同,因为这三个都有keySet和values。什么是哈希表?

Map m1 = new HashMap();
m1.put("map", "HashMap");
m1.put("schildt", "java2");
m1.put("mathew", "Hyden");
m1.put("schildt", "java2s");
print(m1.keySet()); 
print(m1.values()); 

SortedMap sm = new TreeMap();
sm.put("map", "TreeMap");
sm.put("schildt", "java2");
sm.put("mathew", "Hyden");
sm.put("schildt", "java2s");
print(sm.keySet()); 
print(sm.values());

LinkedHashMap lm = new LinkedHashMap();
lm.put("map", "LinkedHashMap");
lm.put("schildt", "java2");
lm.put("mathew", "Hyden");
lm.put("schildt", "java2s");
print(lm.keySet()); 
print(lm.values());

当前回答

哈希映射不保留插入顺序。 的例子。Hashmap 如果您正在插入键作为

1  3
5  9
4   6
7   15
3   10

它可以存储为

4  6
5  9
3  10
1  3
7  15

链接Hashmap保留插入顺序。

的例子。 如果您正在插入键

1  3
5  9
4   6
7   15
3   10

它将存储为

1  3
5  9
4   6
7   15
3   10

和我们插入的一样。

树映射以键的递增顺序存储山谷。 的例子。 如果您正在插入键

1  3
5  9
4   6
7   15
3   10

它将存储为

1  3
3  10
4   6
5   9
7   15

其他回答

以下是HashMap和TreeMap之间的主要区别

HashMap does not maintain any order. In other words , HashMap does not provide any guarantee that the element inserted first will be printed first, where as Just like TreeSet , TreeMap elements are also sorted according to the natural ordering of its elements Internal HashMap implementation use Hashing and TreeMap internally uses Red-Black tree implementation. HashMap can store one null key and many null values.TreeMap can not contain null keys but may contain many null values. HashMap take constant time performance for the basic operations like get and put i.e O(1).According to Oracle docs , TreeMap provides guaranteed log(n) time cost for the get and put method. HashMap is much faster than TreeMap, as performance time of HashMap is constant against the log time TreeMap for most operations. HashMap uses equals() method in comparison while TreeMap uses compareTo() method for maintaining ordering. HashMap implements Map interface while TreeMap implements NavigableMap interface.

HashMap: 不维持秩序 比LinkedHashMap快 用于存储对象堆 LinkedHashMap: LinkedHashMap插入顺序将被维持 比HashMap慢,比TreeMap快 如果你想保持一个插入顺序,使用这个。 TreeMap: TreeMap是一种基于树的映射 TreeMap将遵循键的自然顺序 比HashMap和LinkedHashMap慢 在需要维护自然(默认)排序时使用TreeMap

这些是同一接口的不同实现。每种实现都有一些优点和缺点(快速插入,缓慢搜索),反之亦然。

有关详细信息,请参阅TreeMap, HashMap, LinkedHashMap的javadoc。

这是我自己使用地图的经验,关于我何时使用每种地图:

HashMap - Most useful when looking for a best-performance (fast) implementation. TreeMap (SortedMap interface) - Most useful when I'm concerned with being able to sort or iterate over the keys in a particular order that I define. LinkedHashMap - Combines advantages of guaranteed ordering from TreeMap without the increased cost of maintaining the TreeMap. (It is almost as fast as the HashMap). In particular, the LinkedHashMap also provides a great starting point for creating a Cache object by overriding the removeEldestEntry() method. This lets you create a Cache object that can expire data using some criteria that you define.

我更喜欢视觉呈现:

Property HashMap TreeMap LinkedHashMap
Iteration Order no guaranteed order, will remain constant over time sorted according to the natural ordering insertion-order
Get / put / remove / containsKey O(1) O(log(n)) O(1)
Interfaces Map NavigableMap, Map, SortedMap Map
Null values/keys allowed only values allowed
Fail-fast behavior Fail-fast behavior of an iterator cannot be guaranteed, impossible to make any hard guarantees in the presence of unsynchronized concurrent modification Fail-fast behavior of an iterator cannot be guaranteed, impossible to make any hard guarantees in the presence of unsynchronized concurrent modification Fail-fast behavior of an iterator cannot be guaranteed, impossible to make any hard guarantees in the presence of unsynchronized concurrent modification
Implementation buckets Red-Black Tree double-linked buckets
Is synchronized implementation is not synchronized implementation is not synchronized implementation is not synchronized