SQL Server支持禁用和启用外键约束吗?还是我唯一的选择就是放弃这些限制,然后重新创造这些限制?
当前回答
您可以暂时禁用表上的约束,进行工作,然后重新构建它们。
这里有一个简单的方法…
禁用所有索引,包括主键,这将禁用所有外键,然后重新启用主键,以便您可以使用它们…
DECLARE @sql AS NVARCHAR(max)=''
select @sql = @sql +
'ALTER INDEX ALL ON [' + t.[name] + '] DISABLE;'+CHAR(13)
from
sys.tables t
where type='u'
select @sql = @sql +
'ALTER INDEX ' + i.[name] + ' ON [' + t.[name] + '] REBUILD;'+CHAR(13)
from
sys.key_constraints i
join
sys.tables t on i.parent_object_id=t.object_id
where
i.type='PK'
exec dbo.sp_executesql @sql;
go
[做一些事情,比如加载数据]
然后重新启用和重建索引……
DECLARE @sql AS NVARCHAR(max)=''
select @sql = @sql +
'ALTER INDEX ALL ON [' + t.[name] + '] REBUILD;'+CHAR(13)
from
sys.tables t
where type='u'
exec dbo.sp_executesql @sql;
go
其他回答
如果你想禁用数据库中的所有约束,只需运行以下代码:
-- disable all constraints
EXEC sp_MSforeachtable "ALTER TABLE ? NOCHECK CONSTRAINT all"
要将它们重新打开,运行:(打印当然是可选的,它只是列出表)
-- enable all constraints
exec sp_MSforeachtable @command1="print '?'", @command2="ALTER TABLE ? WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT all"
我发现它在将数据从一个数据库填充到另一个数据库时很有用。这是比放弃约束更好的方法。正如您所提到的,当删除数据库中的所有数据并重新填充它时(例如在测试环境中),它非常方便。
如果您正在删除所有数据,您可能会发现这个解决方案是有用的。
有时禁用所有触发器也很方便,你可以在这里看到完整的解决方案。
如果你感兴趣,我有一个更有用的版本。我从这里提取了一些代码,一个网站的链接不再活跃。我修改了它,以允许存储过程中有一个表数组,并在执行所有语句之前填充删除、截断和添加语句。这使您可以控制决定哪些表需要截断。
/****** Object: UserDefinedTableType [util].[typ_objects_for_managing] Script Date: 03/04/2016 16:42:55 ******/
CREATE TYPE [util].[typ_objects_for_managing] AS TABLE(
[schema] [sysname] NOT NULL,
[object] [sysname] NOT NULL
)
GO
create procedure [util].[truncate_table_with_constraints]
@objects_for_managing util.typ_objects_for_managing readonly
--@schema sysname
--,@table sysname
as
--select
-- @table = 'TABLE',
-- @schema = 'SCHEMA'
declare @exec_table as table (ordinal int identity (1,1), statement nvarchar(4000), primary key (ordinal));
--print '/*Drop Foreign Key Statements for ['+@schema+'].['+@table+']*/'
insert into @exec_table (statement)
select
'ALTER TABLE ['+SCHEMA_NAME(o.schema_id)+'].['+ o.name+'] DROP CONSTRAINT ['+fk.name+']'
from sys.foreign_keys fk
inner join sys.objects o
on fk.parent_object_id = o.object_id
where
exists (
select * from @objects_for_managing chk
where
chk.[schema] = SCHEMA_NAME(o.schema_id)
and
chk.[object] = o.name
)
;
--o.name = @table and
--SCHEMA_NAME(o.schema_id) = @schema
insert into @exec_table (statement)
select
'TRUNCATE TABLE ' + src.[schema] + '.' + src.[object]
from @objects_for_managing src
;
--print '/*Create Foreign Key Statements for ['+@schema+'].['+@table+']*/'
insert into @exec_table (statement)
select 'ALTER TABLE ['+SCHEMA_NAME(o.schema_id)+'].['+o.name+'] ADD CONSTRAINT ['+fk.name+'] FOREIGN KEY (['+c.name+'])
REFERENCES ['+SCHEMA_NAME(refob.schema_id)+'].['+refob.name+'](['+refcol.name+'])'
from sys.foreign_key_columns fkc
inner join sys.foreign_keys fk
on fkc.constraint_object_id = fk.object_id
inner join sys.objects o
on fk.parent_object_id = o.object_id
inner join sys.columns c
on fkc.parent_column_id = c.column_id and
o.object_id = c.object_id
inner join sys.objects refob
on fkc.referenced_object_id = refob.object_id
inner join sys.columns refcol
on fkc.referenced_column_id = refcol.column_id and
fkc.referenced_object_id = refcol.object_id
where
exists (
select * from @objects_for_managing chk
where
chk.[schema] = SCHEMA_NAME(o.schema_id)
and
chk.[object] = o.name
)
;
--o.name = @table and
--SCHEMA_NAME(o.schema_id) = @schema
declare @looper int , @total_records int, @sql_exec nvarchar(4000)
select @looper = 1, @total_records = count(*) from @exec_table;
while @looper <= @total_records
begin
select @sql_exec = (select statement from @exec_table where ordinal =@looper)
exec sp_executesql @sql_exec
print @sql_exec
set @looper = @looper + 1
end
(摘自http://www.sqljunkies.com/WebLog/roman/archive/2005/01/30/7037.aspx, 现在存档在时光倒流机中)
Foreign key constraints and check constraint are very useful for enforcing data integrity and business rules. There are certain scenarios though where it is useful to temporarily turn them off because their behavior is either not needed or could do more harm than good. I sometimes disable constraint checking on tables during data loads from external sources or when I need to script a table drop/recreate with reloading the data back into the table. I usually do it in scenarios where I don't want a time consuming process to fail because one or a few of many million rows have bad data in it. But I always turn the constraints back on once the process is finished and also in some cases I run data integrity checks on the imported data.
如果禁用外键约束,则可以插入父表中不存在的值。如果禁用检查约束,则可以将值放入列中,就像检查约束不存在一样。下面是禁用和启用表约束的一些例子:
——禁用所有表约束 修改表MyTable NOCHECK约束 ——启用所有表约束 修改MyTable,检查检查约束全部 ——禁用单个约束 修改表MyTable NOCHECK约束 ——启用单一约束 ALTER TABLE MyTable WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT MyConstraint
要禁用约束,您可以使用NOCHECK更改表
ALTER TABLE [TABLE_NAME] NOCHECK CONSTRAINT [ALL|CONSTRAINT_NAME]
要使您必须使用双重检查:
ALTER TABLE [TABLE_NAME] WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT [ALL|CONSTRAINT_NAME]
启用时请注意双重CHECK CHECK。 ALL表示表中的所有约束。
一旦完成,如果您需要检查状态,使用这个脚本列出约束状态。会很有帮助:
SELECT (CASE
WHEN OBJECTPROPERTY(CONSTID, 'CNSTISDISABLED') = 0 THEN 'ENABLED'
ELSE 'DISABLED'
END) AS STATUS,
OBJECT_NAME(CONSTID) AS CONSTRAINT_NAME,
OBJECT_NAME(FKEYID) AS TABLE_NAME,
COL_NAME(FKEYID, FKEY) AS COLUMN_NAME,
OBJECT_NAME(RKEYID) AS REFERENCED_TABLE_NAME,
COL_NAME(RKEYID, RKEY) AS REFERENCED_COLUMN_NAME
FROM SYSFOREIGNKEYS
ORDER BY TABLE_NAME, CONSTRAINT_NAME,REFERENCED_TABLE_NAME, KEYNO
几乎可以肯定,检查是必须的!
在一些回答和评论中提出了这一点,但我认为再次提出这一点非常重要。
使用以下命令(不使用WITH CHECK)重新启用约束会有一些严重的缺陷。
ALTER TABLE MyTable CHECK CONSTRAINT MyConstraint;
WITH CHECK | WITH NOCHECK Specifies whether the data in the table is or is not validated against a newly added or re-enabled FOREIGN KEY or CHECK constraint. If not specified, WITH CHECK is assumed for new constraints, and WITH NOCHECK is assumed for re-enabled constraints. If you do not want to verify new CHECK or FOREIGN KEY constraints against existing data, use WITH NOCHECK. We do not recommend doing this, except in rare cases. The new constraint will be evaluated in all later data updates. Any constraint violations that are suppressed by WITH NOCHECK when the constraint is added may cause future updates to fail if they update rows with data that does not comply with the constraint. The query optimizer does not consider constraints that are defined WITH NOCHECK. Such constraints are ignored until they are re-enabled by using ALTER TABLE table WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT ALL.
注意:WITH NOCHECK是重新启用约束的默认值。我想知道为什么……
No existing data in the table will be evaluated during the execution of this command - successful completion is no guarantee that the data in the table is valid according to the constraint. During the next update of the invalid records, the constraint will be evaluated and will fail - resulting in errors that may be unrelated to the actual update that is made. Application logic that relies on the constraint to ensure that data is valid may fail. The query optimizer will not make use of any constraint that is enabled in this way.
sys。Foreign_keys系统视图提供了一些问题的可见性。注意,它有一个is_disabled列和一个is_not_trusted列。Is_disabled指示是否根据约束验证未来的数据操作。Is_not_trusted指示表中当前的所有数据是否已经根据约束进行了验证。
ALTER TABLE MyTable WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT MyConstraint;
你的约束是可信的吗?找出……
SELECT * FROM sys.foreign_keys WHERE is_not_trusted = 1;
推荐文章
- 在SQL中更新多个列
- 如何删除表中特定列的第一个字符?
- 等价的限制和偏移SQL Server?
- 如何从SQL Server中的字符串中剥离所有非字母字符?
- 为什么我不能在DELETE语句中使用别名?
- 多语句表值函数vs内联表值函数
- NOLOCK提示在SELECT语句中的作用
- SQL OVER()子句-它什么时候有用,为什么有用?
- 检查SQL Server登录是否已经存在
- 我如何使用ROW_NUMBER()?
- SQL或者TSQL是图灵完备的吗?
- 如何检查表上持有哪些锁
- SQL Server数据库备份恢复到低版本
- SQL Server:过滤sp_who2的输出
- 在SQL Server上使用varchar(MAX) vs TEXT