我还想添加一个使用插槽的解决方案:

class Point:
    __slots__ = ["x", "y"]
    def __init__(self, x, y):
        self.x = x
        self.y = y

Definitely check the documentation for slots but a quick explanation of slots is that it is python's way of saying: "If you can lock these attributes and only these attributes into the class such that you commit that you will not add any new attributes once the class is instantiated (yes you can add new attributes to a class instance, see example below) then I will do away with the large memory allocation that allows for adding new attributes to a class instance and use just what I need for these slotted attributes".

添加属性到类实例的例子(因此不使用插槽):

class Point:
    def __init__(self, x, y):
        self.x = x
        self.y = y

p1 = Point(3,5)
p1.z = 8
print(p1.z)

输出:8

尝试向使用插槽的类实例添加属性的示例:

class Point:
    __slots__ = ["x", "y"]
    def __init__(self, x, y):
        self.x = x
        self.y = y

p1 = Point(3,5)
p1.z = 8

'Point'对象没有属性'z'

这可以有效地作为结构体工作，并且比类使用更少的内存(就像结构体一样，尽管我没有研究具体有多少内存)。如果要创建对象的大量实例且不需要添加属性，建议使用slot。点对象就是一个很好的例子，因为很可能会实例化许多点来描述一个数据集。

dF:太酷了……我没有 我知道我可以访问的领域 一个使用字典的类。 马克:我希望我遇到的情况 这正是我需要一个元组的时候 但没有什么比 字典。

你可以使用字典访问类的字段，因为类的字段、它的方法和它的所有属性都是用字典存储在内部的(至少在CPython中是这样)。

.．.这就引出了你的第二个评论。相信Python字典是“沉重的”是一个非常非Python主义的概念。读这样的评论简直要了我的Python禅。这可不太好。

您可以看到，当您声明一个类时，实际上是在为一个字典创建一个相当复杂的包装器——因此，如果有的话，您比使用一个简单的字典增加了更多的开销。顺便说一下，这种开销在任何情况下都是没有意义的。如果您正在处理性能关键的应用程序，请使用C或其他语言。

NamedTuple很舒服。但是没有人共享性能和存储。

from typing import NamedTuple
import guppy  # pip install guppy
import timeit


class User:
    def __init__(self, name: str, uid: int):
        self.name = name
        self.uid = uid


class UserSlot:
    __slots__ = ('name', 'uid')

    def __init__(self, name: str, uid: int):
        self.name = name
        self.uid = uid


class UserTuple(NamedTuple):
    # __slots__ = ()  # AttributeError: Cannot overwrite NamedTuple attribute __slots__
    name: str
    uid: int


def get_fn(obj, attr_name: str):
    def get():
        getattr(obj, attr_name)
    return get

if 'memory test':
    obj = [User('Carson', 1) for _ in range(1000000)]      # Cumulative: 189138883
    obj_slot = [UserSlot('Carson', 1) for _ in range(1000000)]          # 77718299  <-- winner
    obj_namedtuple = [UserTuple('Carson', 1) for _ in range(1000000)]   # 85718297
    print(guppy.hpy().heap())  # Run this function individually. 
    """
    Index  Count   %     Size   % Cumulative  % Kind (class / dict of class)
     0 1000000    24 112000000 34 112000000  34 dict of __main__.User
     1 1000000    24 64000000  19 176000000  53 __main__.UserTuple
     2 1000000    24 56000000  17 232000000  70 __main__.User
     3 1000000    24 56000000  17 288000000  87 __main__.UserSlot
     ...
    """

if 'performance test':
    obj = User('Carson', 1)
    obj_slot = UserSlot('Carson', 1)
    obj_tuple = UserTuple('Carson', 1)

    time_normal = min(timeit.repeat(get_fn(obj, 'name'), repeat=20))
    print(time_normal)  # 0.12550550000000005

    time_slot = min(timeit.repeat(get_fn(obj_slot, 'name'), repeat=20))
    print(time_slot)  # 0.1368690000000008

    time_tuple = min(timeit.repeat(get_fn(obj_tuple, 'name'), repeat=20))
    print(time_tuple)  # 0.16006120000000124

    print(time_tuple/time_slot)  # 1.1694481584580898  # The slot is almost 17% faster than NamedTuple on Windows. (Python 3.7.7)

如果你的__dict__没有被使用，请在__slots__(更高的性能和存储)和NamedTuple(清晰的阅读和使用)之间选择。

您可以查看此链接(插槽的使用 )来获取更多的__slots__信息。

也许你正在寻找没有构造函数的struct:

class Sample:
  name = ''
  average = 0.0
  values = None # list cannot be initialized here!


s1 = Sample()
s1.name = "sample 1"
s1.values = []
s1.values.append(1)
s1.values.append(2)
s1.values.append(3)

s2 = Sample()
s2.name = "sample 2"
s2.values = []
s2.values.append(4)

for v in s1.values:   # prints 1,2,3 --> OK.
  print v
print "***"
for v in s2.values:   # prints 4 --> OK.
  print v

如果您没有3.7的@dataclass，并且需要可变性，那么下面的代码可能适合您。它是非常自文档化和ide友好的(自动完成)，防止编写两次内容，易于扩展，并且非常简单地测试所有实例变量都被完全初始化:

class Params():
    def __init__(self):
        self.var1 : int = None
        self.var2 : str = None

    def are_all_defined(self):
        for key, value in self.__dict__.items():
            assert (value is not None), "instance variable {} is still None".format(key)
        return True


params = Params()
params.var1 = 2
params.var2 = 'hello'
assert(params.are_all_defined)

我认为Python结构字典适合这个需求。

d = dict{}
d[field1] = field1
d[field2] = field2
d[field2] = field3