Ruby是严格意义上的值传递，但是值是引用。

这可以称为“pass-reference-by-value”。这篇文章有我读过的最好的解释:http://robertheaton.com/2014/07/22/is-ruby-pass-by-reference-or-pass-by-value/

按值传递引用可以简单地解释如下:

函数接收(并将访问)调用者在内存中使用的同一对象的引用。但是，它不接收调用方存储该对象的盒子;与pass-value-by-value一样，函数提供自己的方框，并为自己创建一个新变量。

结果行为实际上是引用传递和值传递的经典定义的组合。

参数是原始引用的副本。因此，您可以更改值，但不能更改原始引用。

在传统术语中，Ruby是严格的值传递。但这不是你真正想要的。

Ruby doesn't have any concept of a pure, non-reference value, so you certainly can't pass one to a method. Variables are always references to objects. In order to get an object that won't change out from under you, you need to dup or clone the object you're passed, thus giving an object that nobody else has a reference to. (Even this isn't bulletproof, though — both of the standard cloning methods do a shallow copy, so the instance variables of the clone still point to the same objects that the originals did. If the objects referenced by the ivars mutate, that will still show up in the copy, since it's referencing the same objects.)

需要注意的是，您甚至不需要使用“replace”方法来更改原始值。如果你为一个哈希值分配了其中一个哈希值，你就是在改变原始值。

def my_foo(a_hash)
  a_hash["test"]="reference"
end;

hash = {"test"=>"value"}
my_foo(hash)
puts "Ruby is pass-by-#{hash["test"]}"

Ruby是通过引用传递还是通过值传递?

Ruby是引用传递。总是这样。没有例外。没有如果。少啰嗦

下面是一个简单的程序，说明了这一事实:

def foo(bar)
  bar.object_id
end

baz = 'value'

puts "#{baz.object_id} Ruby is pass-by-reference #{foo(baz)} because object_id's (memory addresses) are always the same ;)"

=> 2279146940 Ruby是引用传递的2279146940，因为object_id(内存地址)总是相同的;)

def bar(babar)
  babar.replace("reference")
end

bar(baz)

puts "some people don't realize it's reference because local assignment can take precedence, but it's clearly pass-by-#{baz}"

=>有些人没有意识到它是引用，因为局部赋值可以优先，但它显然是引用传递

Ruby是通过引用传递还是通过值传递?

Ruby是值传递。总是这样。没有例外。没有如果。少啰嗦

下面是一个简单的程序，说明了这一事实:

def foo(bar)
  bar = 'reference'
end

baz = 'value'

foo(baz)

puts "Ruby is pass-by-#{baz}"
# Ruby is pass-by-value