为了在JavaScript中复制数组:下面哪个使用更快?
片的方法
var dup_array = original_array.slice();
For循环
for(var i = 0, len = original_array.length; i < len; ++i)
dup_array[i] = original_array[i];
我知道这两种方法都只做一个浅拷贝:如果original_array包含对对象的引用，对象将不会被克隆，但只有引用将被复制，因此两个数组将有对相同对象的引用。 但这不是问题的关键。
我只是在问速度。
当前回答
在ES6中，你可以简单地利用Spread语法。
例子:
let arr = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
let arr2 = [...arr];
请注意，展开操作符生成了一个全新的数组，因此修改一个不会影响另一个。
例子:
arr2.push('d') // becomes ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
console.log(arr) // while arr retains its values ['a', 'b', 'c']
其他回答
const arr = ['1', '2', '3'];
// Old way
const cloneArr = arr.slice();
// ES6 way
const cloneArrES6 = [...arr];
// But problem with 3rd approach is that if you are using muti-dimensional
// array, then only first level is copied
const nums = [
[1, 2],
[10],
];
const cloneNums = [...nums];
// Let's change the first item in the first nested item in our cloned array.
cloneNums[0][0] = '8';
console.log(cloneNums);
// [ [ '8', 2 ], [ 10 ], [ 300 ] ]
// NOOooo, the original is also affected
console.log(nums);
// [ [ '8', 2 ], [ 10 ], [ 300 ] ]
所以，为了避免这些情况的发生，使用
const arr = ['1', '2', '3'];
const cloneArr = Array.from(arr);
A.map (e => e)是这项工作的另一种选择。到目前为止，.map()在Firefox中非常快(几乎和.slice(0)一样快)，但在Chrome中则不然。
另一方面，如果一个数组是多维的，因为数组是对象，对象是引用类型，没有一个slice或concat方法将是治愈…因此，克隆数组的一种正确方法是array .prototype.clone()的发明，如下所示。
Array.prototype.clone = function(){ 返回。map(e => Array.isArray(e) ?e.clone(): e); }; var arr =[1、2、3、4(1、2(1、2、3),4、5],6], BRR = arr.clone(); Brr [4][2][1] = " 2 "; console.log (JSON.stringify (arr)); console.log (JSON.stringify (brr));
ECMAScript 2015的扩展操作符方式:
基本的例子:
var copyOfOldArray = [...oldArray]
var twoArraysBecomeOne = [...firstArray, ..seccondArray]
在浏览器控制台中尝试:
var oldArray = [1, 2, 3]
var copyOfOldArray = [...oldArray]
console.log(oldArray)
console.log(copyOfOldArray)
var firstArray = [5, 6, 7]
var seccondArray = ["a", "b", "c"]
var twoArraysBecomOne = [...firstArray, ...seccondArray]
console.log(twoArraysBecomOne);
参考文献
展开运算符的6大用途 传播的语法
基准时间!
function log(data) { document.getElementById("log").textContent += data + "\n"; } benchmark = (() => { time_function = function(ms, f, num) { var z = 0; var t = new Date().getTime(); for (z = 0; ((new Date().getTime() - t) < ms); z++) f(num); return (z) } function clone1(arr) { return arr.slice(0); } function clone2(arr) { return [...arr] } function clone3(arr) { return [].concat(arr); } Array.prototype.clone = function() { return this.map(e => Array.isArray(e) ? e.clone() : e); }; function clone4(arr) { return arr.clone(); } function benchmark() { function compare(a, b) { if (a[1] > b[1]) { return -1; } if (a[1] < b[1]) { return 1; } return 0; } funcs = [clone1, clone2, clone3, clone4]; results = []; funcs.forEach((ff) => { console.log("Benchmarking: " + ff.name); var s = time_function(2500, ff, Array(1024)); results.push([ff, s]); console.log("Score: " + s); }) return results.sort(compare); } return benchmark; })() log("Starting benchmark...\n"); res = benchmark(); console.log("Winner: " + res[0][0].name + " !!!"); count = 1; res.forEach((r) => { log((count++) + ". " + r[0].name + " score: " + Math.floor(10000 * r[1] / res[0][1]) / 100 + ((count == 2) ? "% *winner*" : "% speed of winner.") + " (" + Math.round(r[1] * 100) / 100 + ")"); }); log("\nWinner code:\n"); log(res[0][0].toString()); <textarea rows="50" cols="80" style="font-size: 16; resize:none; border: none;" id="log"></textarea>
自单击按钮以来，基准测试将运行10秒。
我的结果:
Chrome (V8引擎):
1. clone1 score: 100% *winner* (4110764)
2. clone3 score: 74.32% speed of winner. (3055225)
3. clone2 score: 30.75% speed of winner. (1264182)
4. clone4 score: 21.96% speed of winner. (902929)
Firefox (SpiderMonkey Engine):
1. clone1 score: 100% *winner* (8448353)
2. clone3 score: 16.44% speed of winner. (1389241)
3. clone4 score: 5.69% speed of winner. (481162)
4. clone2 score: 2.27% speed of winner. (192433)
赢家代码:
function clone1(arr) {
return arr.slice(0);
}
赢家引擎: SpiderMonkey (Mozilla Firefox)
一个简单的解决方案:
original = [1,2,3]
cloned = original.map(x=>x)
