我想你可以试试这个。

MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = new MyObject(myObj); //DeepClone it

虽然一种方法是实现ICloneable接口（在这里描述，所以我不会反悔），但这里有一个很好的深度克隆对象复制器，我不久前在代码项目中找到了它，并将其合并到我们的代码中。如其他地方所述，它要求您的对象是可序列化的。

using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Runtime.Serialization;
using System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary;

/// <summary>
/// Reference Article http://www.codeproject.com/KB/tips/SerializedObjectCloner.aspx
/// Provides a method for performing a deep copy of an object.
/// Binary Serialization is used to perform the copy.
/// </summary>
public static class ObjectCopier
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Perform a deep copy of the object via serialization.
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
    /// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
    /// <returns>A deep copy of the object.</returns>
    public static T Clone<T>(T source)
    {
        if (!typeof(T).IsSerializable)
        {
            throw new ArgumentException("The type must be serializable.", nameof(source));
        }

        // Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
        if (ReferenceEquals(source, null)) return default;

        using var Stream stream = new MemoryStream();
        IFormatter formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
        formatter.Serialize(stream, source);
        stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
        return (T)formatter.Deserialize(stream);
    }
}

其思想是它序列化对象，然后将其反序列化为新对象。好处是，当对象变得太复杂时，您不必担心克隆任何东西。

如果您希望使用C#3.0的新扩展方法，请将该方法更改为具有以下签名：

public static T Clone<T>(this T source)
{
   // ...
}

现在，方法调用简单地变成objectBeingCloned.Clone（）；。

EDIT（2015年1月10日）我想我会重新考虑这个问题，要说我最近开始使用（Newtonsoft）Json来做这个，它应该更轻，并避免[Serializable]标签的开销。（NB@atconway在评论中指出，私有成员不是使用JSON方法克隆的）

/// <summary>
/// Perform a deep Copy of the object, using Json as a serialization method. NOTE: Private members are not cloned using this method.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of object being copied.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The object instance to copy.</param>
/// <returns>The copied object.</returns>
public static T CloneJson<T>(this T source)
{            
    // Don't serialize a null object, simply return the default for that object
    if (ReferenceEquals(source, null)) return default;

    // initialize inner objects individually
    // for example in default constructor some list property initialized with some values,
    // but in 'source' these items are cleaned -
    // without ObjectCreationHandling.Replace default constructor values will be added to result
    var deserializeSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings {ObjectCreationHandling = ObjectCreationHandling.Replace};

    return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(source), deserializeSettings);
}

使用IClonable接口可以花费多少精力是令人难以置信的，尤其是当您有大量的类层次结构时。MemberwiseColone的工作方式也很奇怪——它甚至不能完全克隆普通的List类型的结构。

当然，串行化最有趣的困境是串行化反向引用——例如，具有子-父关系的类层次结构。我怀疑二进制序列化程序能否在这种情况下帮助您。（最终将导致递归循环+堆栈溢出）。

不知怎么的，我喜欢这里提出的解决方案：如何在.NET（特别是C#）中对对象进行深度复制？

然而，它不支持Lists，并补充说，该支持还考虑到了重新养育子女的问题。对于我制定的仅为父项的规则，该字段或属性应命名为“parent”，则DeepClone将忽略它。您可能需要决定自己的反向引用规则——对于树层次结构，它可能是“左/右”等。。。

以下是包含测试代码的完整代码片段：

using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Text;

namespace TestDeepClone
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            A a = new A();
            a.name = "main_A";
            a.b_list.Add(new B(a) { name = "b1" });
            a.b_list.Add(new B(a) { name = "b2" });

            A a2 = (A)a.DeepClone();
            a2.name = "second_A";

            // Perform re-parenting manually after deep copy.
            foreach( var b in a2.b_list )
                b.parent = a2;


            Debug.WriteLine("ok");

        }
    }

    public class A
    {
        public String name = "one";
        public List<String> list = new List<string>();
        public List<String> null_list;
        public List<B> b_list = new List<B>();
        private int private_pleaseCopyMeAsWell = 5;

        public override string ToString()
        {
            return "A(" + name + ")";
        }
    }

    public class B
    {
        public B() { }
        public B(A _parent) { parent = _parent; }
        public A parent;
        public String name = "two";
    }


    public static class ReflectionEx
    {
        public static Type GetUnderlyingType(this MemberInfo member)
        {
            Type type;
            switch (member.MemberType)
            {
                case MemberTypes.Field:
                    type = ((FieldInfo)member).FieldType;
                    break;
                case MemberTypes.Property:
                    type = ((PropertyInfo)member).PropertyType;
                    break;
                case MemberTypes.Event:
                    type = ((EventInfo)member).EventHandlerType;
                    break;
                default:
                    throw new ArgumentException("member must be if type FieldInfo, PropertyInfo or EventInfo", "member");
            }
            return Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(type) ?? type;
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Gets fields and properties into one array.
        /// Order of properties / fields will be preserved in order of appearance in class / struct. (MetadataToken is used for sorting such cases)
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="type">Type from which to get</param>
        /// <returns>array of fields and properties</returns>
        public static MemberInfo[] GetFieldsAndProperties(this Type type)
        {
            List<MemberInfo> fps = new List<MemberInfo>();
            fps.AddRange(type.GetFields());
            fps.AddRange(type.GetProperties());
            fps = fps.OrderBy(x => x.MetadataToken).ToList();
            return fps.ToArray();
        }

        public static object GetValue(this MemberInfo member, object target)
        {
            if (member is PropertyInfo)
            {
                return (member as PropertyInfo).GetValue(target, null);
            }
            else if (member is FieldInfo)
            {
                return (member as FieldInfo).GetValue(target);
            }
            else
            {
                throw new Exception("member must be either PropertyInfo or FieldInfo");
            }
        }

        public static void SetValue(this MemberInfo member, object target, object value)
        {
            if (member is PropertyInfo)
            {
                (member as PropertyInfo).SetValue(target, value, null);
            }
            else if (member is FieldInfo)
            {
                (member as FieldInfo).SetValue(target, value);
            }
            else
            {
                throw new Exception("destinationMember must be either PropertyInfo or FieldInfo");
            }
        }

        /// <summary>
        /// Deep clones specific object.
        /// Analogue can be found here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/129389/how-do-you-do-a-deep-copy-an-object-in-net-c-specifically
        /// This is now improved version (list support added)
        /// </summary>
        /// <param name="obj">object to be cloned</param>
        /// <returns>full copy of object.</returns>
        public static object DeepClone(this object obj)
        {
            if (obj == null)
                return null;

            Type type = obj.GetType();

            if (obj is IList)
            {
                IList list = ((IList)obj);
                IList newlist = (IList)Activator.CreateInstance(obj.GetType(), list.Count);

                foreach (object elem in list)
                    newlist.Add(DeepClone(elem));

                return newlist;
            } //if

            if (type.IsValueType || type == typeof(string))
            {
                return obj;
            }
            else if (type.IsArray)
            {
                Type elementType = Type.GetType(type.FullName.Replace("[]", string.Empty));
                var array = obj as Array;
                Array copied = Array.CreateInstance(elementType, array.Length);

                for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++)
                    copied.SetValue(DeepClone(array.GetValue(i)), i);

                return Convert.ChangeType(copied, obj.GetType());
            }
            else if (type.IsClass)
            {
                object toret = Activator.CreateInstance(obj.GetType());

                MemberInfo[] fields = type.GetFieldsAndProperties();
                foreach (MemberInfo field in fields)
                {
                    // Don't clone parent back-reference classes. (Using special kind of naming 'parent' 
                    // to indicate child's parent class.
                    if (field.Name == "parent")
                    {
                        continue;
                    }

                    object fieldValue = field.GetValue(obj);

                    if (fieldValue == null)
                        continue;

                    field.SetValue(toret, DeepClone(fieldValue));
                }

                return toret;
            }
            else
            {
                // Don't know that type, don't know how to clone it.
                if (Debugger.IsAttached)
                    Debugger.Break();

                return null;
            }
        } //DeepClone
    }

}

遵循以下步骤：

使用返回T的只读Self属性和ICloneable＜out T＞定义ISelf＜T＞，ICloneale＜out T＜派生自ISelf＞并包含方法T Clone（）。然后定义一个CloneBase类型，该类型实现了一个受保护的虚拟泛型VirtualClone，将MemberwiseClone转换为传入的类型。每个派生类型都应该通过调用基本克隆方法来实现VirtualClone，然后执行所需的操作来正确克隆父VirtualClone方法尚未处理的派生类型的那些方面。

为了实现最大的继承通用性，公开公共克隆功能的类应该是密封的，但派生自一个基类，该基类在其他方面是相同的，除非缺少克隆。不要传递显式可克隆类型的变量，而是采用ICloneable＜theNonCloneableType＞类型的参数。这将允许期望Foo的可克隆衍生物与DerivedFoo的可克隆衍生物一起工作的例程，但也允许创建Foo的不可克隆衍生物。

我想你可以试试这个。

MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = new MyObject(myObj); //DeepClone it

我找到了一种新的方法，那就是Emit。

我们可以使用Emit将IL添加到应用程序并运行它。但我认为这不是一个好方法，因为我想完善这一点，所以我写了我的答案。

Emit可以看到官方文件和指南

你应该学习一些IL来阅读代码。我将编写可以在类中复制属性的代码。

public static class Clone
{        
    // ReSharper disable once InconsistentNaming
    public static void CloneObjectWithIL<T>(T source, T los)
    {
        //see http://lindexi.oschina.io/lindexi/post/C-%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8Emit%E6%B7%B1%E5%85%8B%E9%9A%86/
        if (CachedIl.ContainsKey(typeof(T)))
        {
            ((Action<T, T>) CachedIl[typeof(T)])(source, los);
            return;
        }
        var dynamicMethod = new DynamicMethod("Clone", null, new[] { typeof(T), typeof(T) });
        ILGenerator generator = dynamicMethod.GetILGenerator();

        foreach (var temp in typeof(T).GetProperties().Where(temp => temp.CanRead && temp.CanWrite))
        {
            //do not copy static that will except
            if (temp.GetAccessors(true)[0].IsStatic)
            {
                continue;
            }

            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_1);// los
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);// s
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Callvirt, temp.GetMethod);
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Callvirt, temp.SetMethod);
        }
        generator.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
        var clone = (Action<T, T>) dynamicMethod.CreateDelegate(typeof(Action<T, T>));
        CachedIl[typeof(T)] = clone;
        clone(source, los);
    }

    private static Dictionary<Type, Delegate> CachedIl { set; get; } = new Dictionary<Type, Delegate>();
}

代码可以是深度复制，但它可以复制属性。如果你想让它成为深度副本，你可以改变它，因为IL太难了，我做不到。