一般来说，使用正则表达式来验证电子邮件地址并不是一件容易的事情;在撰写本文时，电子邮件地址的语法必须遵循相对较多的标准，在正则表达式中实现所有这些标准实际上是不可行的!

我强烈建议你试试我们的EmailVerify。NET是一个成熟的。NET库，它可以根据当前所有的IETF标准(RFC 1123, RFC 2821, RFC 2822, RFC 3696, RFC 4291, RFC 5321和RFC 5322)验证电子邮件地址，测试相关的DNS记录，检查目标邮箱是否可以接受消息，甚至可以判断给定的地址是否是一次性的。

免责声明:我是这个组件的主要开发人员。

以前，我写了一个EmailAddressValidationAttribute，它应该正确地验证表单中几乎任何相对正常的电子邮件地址

local-part@domain

它是System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations。ValidationAttribute，所以使用非常简单。

而且，由于挖掘所有rfc和勘误表，并组装所需的所有位来正确枚举所有规则……太乏味了!-我在回答c#电子邮件地址验证源代码的问题时发布了验证器的源代码。

我的验证器无论怎么想象都不是完美的，只是对于初学者来说，它没有任何内置的对发出客户端javascript验证的支持，尽管将其添加进来并不太难。从我上面的回答来看:

Here's the validation attribute I wrote. It validates pretty much every "raw" email address, that is those of the form local-part@domain. It doesn't support any of the other, more...creative constructs that the RFCs allow (this list is not comprehensive by any means): comments (e.g., jsmith@whizbang.com (work)) quoted strings (escaped text, to allow characters not allowed in an atom) domain literals (e.g. foo@[123.45.67.012]) bang-paths (aka source routing) angle addresses (e.g. John Smith <jsmith@whizbang.com>) folding whitespace double-byte characters in either local-part or domain (7-bit ASCII only). etc. It should accept almost any email address that can be expressed thusly foo.bar@bazbat.com without requiring the use of quotes ("), angle brackets ('<>') or square brackets ([]). No attempt is made to validate that the rightmost dns label in the domain is a valid TLD (top-level domain). That is because the list of TLDs is far larger now than the "big 6" (.com, .edu, .gov, .mil, .net, .org) plus 2-letter ISO country codes. ICANN actually updates the TLD list daily, though I suspect that the list doesn't actually change daily. Further, [ICANN just approved a big expansion of the generic TLD namespace][2]). And some email addresses don't have what you'd recognize as a TLD (did you know that postmaster@. is theoretically valid and mailable? Mail to that address should get delivered to the postmaster of the DNS root zone.) Extending the regular expression to support domain literals shouldn't be too difficult.

public static bool IsEmail(string strEmail)
{
    Regex rgxEmail = new Regex(@"^([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}" +
                               @"\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\" +
                               @".)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)$");
    return rgxEmail.IsMatch(strEmail);
}

我用的是单线法，它对我有用

using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;
public bool IsValidEmail(string source)
{
    return new EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid(source);
}

根据注释，如果源(电子邮件地址)为空，这将“失败”。

public static bool IsValidEmailAddress(this string address) => address != null && new EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid(address);

如果你正在使用FluentValidation，你可以写一些像这样简单的东西:

public cass User
{
    public string Email { get; set; }
}

public class UserValidator : AbstractValidator<User>
{
    public UserValidator()
    {
        RuleFor(x => x.Email).EmailAddress().WithMessage("The text entered is not a valid email address.");
    }
}

// Validates an user. 
var validationResult = new UserValidator().Validate(new User { Email = "açflkdj" });

// This will return false, since the user email is not valid.
bool userIsValid = validationResult.IsValid;

识别电子邮件id是否有效的简单方法。

public static bool EmailIsValid(string email)
{
        return Regex.IsMatch(email, @"^([\w-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([\w-]+\.)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)$");
}