验证字符串是否是有效的电子邮件地址的最优雅的代码是什么?
当前回答
/// <summary>
/// Validates the email if it follows the valid email format
/// </summary>
/// <param name="emailAddress"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static bool EmailIsValid(string emailAddress)
{
//if string is not null and empty then check for email follow the format
return string.IsNullOrEmpty(emailAddress)?false : new Regex(@"^(?!\.)(""([^""\r\\]|\\[""\r\\])*""|([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?<!\.)\.)*)(?<!\.)@[a-z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase).IsMatch(emailAddress);
}
其他回答
我根据维基百科的规则和样本地址创建了一个电子邮件地址验证程序。对于那些不介意多看一点代码的人，这里。说实话，我不知道电子邮件地址规范中有这么多疯狂的规则。我没有完全验证主机名或ipaddress，但它仍然通过了维基百科上的所有测试用例。
using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
namespace EmailValidateUnitTests
{
[TestClass]
public class EmailValidationUnitTests
{
[TestMethod]
public void TestEmailValidate()
{
// Positive Assertions
Assert.IsTrue("prettyandsimple@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("very.common@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("disposable.style.email.with+symbol@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("other.email-with-dash@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("\"much.more unusual\"@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("\"very.unusual.@.unusual.com\"@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //"very.unusual.@.unusual.com"@example.com
Assert.IsTrue("\"very.(),:;<>[]\\\".VERY.\\\"very@\\\\ \\\"very\\\".unusual\"@strange.example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //"very.(),:;<>[]\".VERY.\"very@\\ \"very\".unusual"@strange.example.com
Assert.IsTrue("admin@mailserver1".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("#!$%&'*+-/=?^_`{}|~@example.org".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("\"()<>[]:,;@\\\\\\\"!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{}| ~.a\"@example.org".IsValidEmailAddress()); //"()<>[]:,;@\\\"!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{}| ~.a"@example.org
Assert.IsTrue("\" \"@example.org".IsValidEmailAddress()); //" "@example.org (space between the quotes)
Assert.IsTrue("example@localhost".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("example@s.solutions".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("user@com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("user@localserver".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("user@[IPv6:2001:db8::1]".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("user@[192.168.2.1]".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("(comment and stuff)joe@gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("joe(comment and stuff)@gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("joe@(comment and stuff)gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsTrue("joe@gmail.com(comment and stuff)".IsValidEmailAddress());
// Failure Assertions
Assert.IsFalse("joe(fail me)smith@gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("joesmith@gma(fail me)il.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("joe@gmail.com(comment and stuff".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("Abc.example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("A@b@c@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("a\"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[j\\k]l@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //a"b(c)d,e:f;g<h>i[j\k]l@example.com
Assert.IsFalse("just\"not\"right@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //just"not"right@example.com
Assert.IsFalse("this is\"not\\allowed@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress()); //this is"not\allowed@example.com
Assert.IsFalse("this\\ still\\\"not\\\\allowed@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());//this\ still\"not\\allowed@example.com
Assert.IsFalse("john..doe@example.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("john.doe@example..com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse(" joe@gmail.com".IsValidEmailAddress());
Assert.IsFalse("joe@gmail.com ".IsValidEmailAddress());
}
}
public static class ExtensionMethods
{
private const string ValidLocalPartChars = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`{|}~";
private const string ValidQuotedLocalPartChars = "(),:;<>@[]. ";
private const string ValidDomainPartChars = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789-:";
private enum EmailParseMode
{
BeginLocal, Local, QuotedLocalEscape, QuotedLocal, QuotedLocalEnd, LocalSplit, LocalComment,
At,
Domain, DomainSplit, DomainComment, BracketedDomain, BracketedDomainEnd
};
public static bool IsValidEmailAddress(this string s)
{
bool valid = true;
bool hasLocal = false, hasDomain = false;
int commentStart = -1, commentEnd = -1;
var mode = EmailParseMode.BeginLocal;
for (int i = 0; i < s.Length; i++)
{
char c = s[i];
if (mode == EmailParseMode.BeginLocal || mode == EmailParseMode.LocalSplit)
{
if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.LocalComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else if (c == '"') { mode = EmailParseMode.QuotedLocal; }
else if (ValidLocalPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { mode = EmailParseMode.Local; hasLocal = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.LocalComment)
{
if (c == ')')
{
mode = EmailParseMode.Local; commentEnd = i;
// comments can only be at beginning and end of parts...
if (commentStart != 0 && ((commentEnd + 1) < s.Length) && s[commentEnd + 1] != '@') { valid = false; break; }
}
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.Local)
{
if (c == '.') mode = EmailParseMode.LocalSplit;
else if (c == '@') mode = EmailParseMode.At;
else if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.LocalComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else if (ValidLocalPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { hasLocal = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.QuotedLocal)
{
if (c == '"') { mode = EmailParseMode.QuotedLocalEnd; }
else if (c == '\\') { mode = EmailParseMode.QuotedLocalEscape; }
else if (ValidLocalPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0 || ValidQuotedLocalPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { hasLocal = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.QuotedLocalEscape)
{
if (c == '"' || c == '\\') { mode = EmailParseMode.QuotedLocal; hasLocal = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.QuotedLocalEnd)
{
if (c == '.') { mode = EmailParseMode.LocalSplit; }
else if (c == '@') mode = EmailParseMode.At;
else if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.LocalComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.At)
{
if (c == '[') { mode = EmailParseMode.BracketedDomain; }
else if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.DomainComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else if (ValidDomainPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { mode = EmailParseMode.Domain; hasDomain = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.DomainComment)
{
if (c == ')')
{
mode = EmailParseMode.Domain;
commentEnd = i;
// comments can only be at beginning and end of parts...
if ((commentEnd + 1) != s.Length && (commentStart > 0) && s[commentStart - 1] != '@') { valid = false; break; }
}
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.DomainSplit)
{
if (ValidDomainPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { mode = EmailParseMode.Domain; hasDomain = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.Domain)
{
if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.DomainComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else if (c == '.') { mode = EmailParseMode.DomainSplit; }
else if (ValidDomainPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { hasDomain = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.BracketedDomain)
{
if (c == ']') { mode = EmailParseMode.BracketedDomainEnd; }
else if (c == '.' || ValidDomainPartChars.IndexOf(c) >= 0) { hasDomain = true; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
else if (mode == EmailParseMode.BracketedDomain)
{
if (c == '(') { mode = EmailParseMode.DomainComment; commentStart = i; commentEnd = -1; }
else { valid = false; break; }
}
}
bool unfinishedComment = (commentEnd == -1 && commentStart >= 0);
return hasLocal && hasDomain && valid && !unfinishedComment;
}
}
}
以前，我写了一个EmailAddressValidationAttribute，它应该正确地验证表单中几乎任何相对正常的电子邮件地址
local-part@domain
它是System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations。ValidationAttribute，所以使用非常简单。
而且，由于挖掘所有rfc和勘误表，并组装所需的所有位来正确枚举所有规则……太乏味了!-我在回答c#电子邮件地址验证源代码的问题时发布了验证器的源代码。
我的验证器无论怎么想象都不是完美的，只是对于初学者来说，它没有任何内置的对发出客户端javascript验证的支持，尽管将其添加进来并不太难。从我上面的回答来看:
Here's the validation attribute I wrote. It validates pretty much every "raw" email address, that is those of the form local-part@domain. It doesn't support any of the other, more...creative constructs that the RFCs allow (this list is not comprehensive by any means): comments (e.g., jsmith@whizbang.com (work)) quoted strings (escaped text, to allow characters not allowed in an atom) domain literals (e.g. foo@[123.45.67.012]) bang-paths (aka source routing) angle addresses (e.g. John Smith <jsmith@whizbang.com>) folding whitespace double-byte characters in either local-part or domain (7-bit ASCII only). etc. It should accept almost any email address that can be expressed thusly foo.bar@bazbat.com without requiring the use of quotes ("), angle brackets ('<>') or square brackets ([]). No attempt is made to validate that the rightmost dns label in the domain is a valid TLD (top-level domain). That is because the list of TLDs is far larger now than the "big 6" (.com, .edu, .gov, .mil, .net, .org) plus 2-letter ISO country codes. ICANN actually updates the TLD list daily, though I suspect that the list doesn't actually change daily. Further, [ICANN just approved a big expansion of the generic TLD namespace][2]). And some email addresses don't have what you'd recognize as a TLD (did you know that postmaster@. is theoretically valid and mailable? Mail to that address should get delivered to the postmaster of the DNS root zone.) Extending the regular expression to support domain literals shouldn't be too difficult.
如果你真的，我是说真的想知道一个电子邮件地址是否有效……请邮件交换器来证明它，不需要正则表达式。如果需要，我可以提供代码。
一般步骤如下: 1. 电子邮件地址有域名部分吗?(@ > 0的索引) 2. 使用DNS查询询问域是否有邮件交换器 3.打开到邮件交换器的TCP连接 4. 使用SMTP协议，以电子邮件地址作为接收者打开到服务器的消息 5. 解析服务器的响应。 6. 如果你能走到这一步，就别发短信了，一切都好。
正如您可以想象的那样，这是非常昂贵的时间，并且依赖于smtp，但它确实有效。
There are a lot of strong answers here. However, I recommend that we take a step back. @Cogwheel answers the question https://stackoverflow.com/a/1374644/388267. Nevertheless, it could be costly in a bulk validation scenario, if many of the email address being validated are invalid. I suggest that we employ a bit of logic before we enter into his try-catch block. I know that the following code could be written using RegEx but that could be costly for new developers to understand. This is my twopence worth:
public static bool IsEmail(this string input)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(input)) return false;
// MUST CONTAIN ONE AND ONLY ONE @
var atCount = input.Count(c => c == '@');
if (atCount != 1) return false;
// MUST CONTAIN PERIOD
if (!input.Contains(".")) return false;
// @ MUST OCCUR BEFORE LAST PERIOD
var indexOfAt = input.IndexOf("@", StringComparison.Ordinal);
var lastIndexOfPeriod = input.LastIndexOf(".", StringComparison.Ordinal);
var atBeforeLastPeriod = lastIndexOfPeriod > indexOfAt;
if (!atBeforeLastPeriod) return false;
// CODE FROM COGWHEEL'S ANSWER: https://stackoverflow.com/a/1374644/388267
try
{
var addr = new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(input);
return addr.Address == input;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
识别电子邮件id是否有效的简单方法。
public static bool EmailIsValid(string email)
{
return Regex.IsMatch(email, @"^([\w-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([\w-]+\.)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)$");
}
推荐文章
- net HttpClient。如何POST字符串值?
- 我如何使一个方法的返回类型泛型?
- 如何从终端机发送电子邮件?
- 何时处理CancellationTokenSource?
- 如何获取正在执行的程序集版本?
- AutoMapper vs valueinjector
- 为什么控制台不。Writeline,控制台。在Visual Studio Express中编写工作?
- 什么是.NET程序集?
- 字符串不能识别为有效的日期时间“格式dd/MM/yyyy”
- 函数应该返回空对象还是空对象?
- 如何转换日期时间?将日期时间
- 如何在c#中连接列表?
- 在c#中引用类型变量的“ref”的用途是什么?
- 防止在ASP中缓存。NET MVC中使用属性的特定操作
- 转换为值类型'Int32'失败，因为物化值为空
