/// <summary>
    /// Validates the email if it follows the valid email format
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="emailAddress"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static bool EmailIsValid(string emailAddress)
    {
        //if string is not null and empty then check for email follow the format
        return string.IsNullOrEmpty(emailAddress)?false : new Regex(@"^(?!\.)(""([^""\r\\]|\\[""\r\\])*""|([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?<!\.)\.)*)(?<!\.)@[a-z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$", RegexOptions.IgnoreCase).IsMatch(emailAddress);
    }

我总结了以上所有的答案，截至2021年，我在这门课上为自己写的答案:

public static class StringExt {
    private const string emailPattern = @"^(?!\.)(""([^""\r\\]|\\[""\r\\])*""|" 
            + @"([-a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~]|(?<!\.)\.)*)(?<!\.)" 
            + @"@[a-z0-9][\w\.-]*[a-z0-9]\.[a-z][a-z\.]*[a-z]$";

    public static bool IsValidMailAddress(this string pThis) 
            => pThis is not null 
            && Regex.IsMatch(pThis, emailPattern, RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);
}

public static bool IsEmail(string strEmail)
{
    Regex rgxEmail = new Regex(@"^([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}" +
                               @"\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\" +
                               @".)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})(\]?)$");
    return rgxEmail.IsMatch(strEmail);
}

最优雅的方法是使用. net的内置方法。

这些方法:

都是经过考验的。我在自己的专业项目中使用了这些方法。 内部使用正则表达式，这是可靠和快速的。 由微软为c#编写。没有必要做重复的工作。 返回bool类型的结果。True表示邮件有效。

适用于。net 4.5及以上版本的用户

将此引用添加到项目中:

System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations

现在你可以使用下面的代码:

(new EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid("youremailhere@test.test"));

使用实例

下面是一些需要声明的方法:

protected List<string> GetRecipients() // Gets recipients from TextBox named `TxtRecipients`
{
    List<string> MethodResult = null;

    try
    {
        List<string> Recipients = TxtRecipients.Text.Replace(",",";").Replace(" ", "").Split(';').ToList();

        List<string> RecipientsCleaned = new List<string>();

        foreach (string Recipient in RecipientsCleaned)
        {
            if (!String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(Recipient))
            {
                RecipientsNoBlanks.Add(Recipient);

            }

        }

        MethodResult = RecipientsNoBlanks;

    }
    catch//(Exception ex)
    {
        //ex.HandleException();
    }

    return MethodResult;

}


public static bool IsValidEmailAddresses(List<string> recipients)
{
    List<string> InvalidAddresses = GetInvalidEmailAddresses(recipients);

    return InvalidAddresses != null && InvalidAddresses.Count == 0;

}

public static List<string> GetInvalidEmailAddresses(List<string> recipients)
{
    List<string> MethodResult = null;

    try
    {
        List<string> InvalidEmailAddresses = new List<string>();

        foreach (string Recipient in recipients)
        {
            if (!(new EmailAddressAttribute().IsValid(Recipient)) && !InvalidEmailAddresses.Contains(Recipient))
            {
                InvalidEmailAddresses.Add(Recipient);

            }

        }

        MethodResult = InvalidEmailAddresses;

    }
    catch//(Exception ex)
    {
        //ex.HandleException();

    }

    return MethodResult;

}

.．.以及演示它们的代码:

List<string> Recipients = GetRecipients();

bool IsValidEmailAddresses = IsValidEmailAddresses(Recipients);

if (IsValidEmailAddresses)
{
    //Emails are valid. Your code here

}
else
{
    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();

    sb.Append("The following addresses are invalid:");

    List<string> InvalidEmails = GetInvalidEmailAddresses(Recipients);

    foreach (string InvalidEmail in InvalidEmails)
    {
        sb.Append("\n" + InvalidEmail);

    }

    MessageBox.Show(sb.ToString());

}

另外，这个例子:

扩展超出规范，因为一个字符串用于包含0，一个或多个由分号分隔的电子邮件地址; 清楚地演示了如何使用EmailAddressAttribute对象的IsValid方法。

对于.Net 4.5以下版本的用户，可以选择

对于.Net 4.5不可用的情况，我使用以下解决方案:

具体来说，我使用:

public static bool IsValidEmailAddress(string emailAddress)
{
    bool MethodResult = false;

    try
    {
        MailAddress m = new MailAddress(emailAddress);

        MethodResult = m.Address == emailAddress;

    }
    catch //(Exception ex)
    {
        //ex.HandleException();

    }

    return MethodResult;

}

public static List<string> GetInvalidEmailAddresses(List<string> recipients)
{
    List<string> MethodResult = null;

    try
    {
        List<string> InvalidEmailAddresses = new List<string>();

        foreach (string Recipient in recipients)
        {
            if (!IsValidEmail(Recipient) && !InvalidEmailAddresses.Contains(Recipient))
            {
                InvalidEmailAddresses.Add(Recipient);

            }

        }

        MethodResult = InvalidEmailAddresses;

    }
    catch //(Exception ex)
    {
        //ex.HandleException();

    }

    return MethodResult;

}

我只是想指出，最近在. net文档中增加了关于电子邮件验证的内容，也使用了Regex操作。 关于它们实现的详细解释可以在那里找到。

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/base-types/how-to-verify-that-strings-are-in-valid-email-format

为了方便起见，下面是他们的测试结果:

//       Valid: david.jones@proseware.com
//       Valid: d.j@server1.proseware.com
//       Valid: jones@ms1.proseware.com
//       Invalid: j.@server1.proseware.com
//       Valid: j@proseware.com9
//       Valid: js#internal@proseware.com
//       Valid: j_9@[129.126.118.1]
//       Invalid: j..s@proseware.com
//       Invalid: js*@proseware.com
//       Invalid: js@proseware..com
//       Valid: js@proseware.com9
//       Valid: j.s@server1.proseware.com
//       Valid: "j\"s\""@proseware.com
//       Valid: js@contoso.中国

如果您将多个解决方案组合在一起来编写完美的代码呢?

我得到了排名最高的2个解决方案和评论，并结合起来得到更准确的答案。 它的短，快和可爱。

    public static bool isValidEmail(string email)
    {
        try
        {
            var addr = new System.Net.Mail.MailAddress(email);
            if (addr.Address == email)
            {
                string expression = "\\w+([-+.']\\w+)*@\\w+([-.]\\w+)*\\.\\w+([-.]\\w+)*"; 
                if (Regex.IsMatch(email, expression))
                {
                    if (Regex.Replace(email, expression, string.Empty).Length == 0) 
                        return true; 
                }
                return false;
            }
            return false; 
        }
        catch
        {
            return false;
        }  
    }