反向波兰符号。这意味着实参在函数之前。换句话说，2加2就是2 +。

具有WTF特性的语言包括Forth、Postscript(是的，激光打印机的Postscript)和Factor。

在C或c++中，使用宏可以获得很多乐趣。如

#define FOO(a,b) (a+b)/(1-a)

如果传入FOO(bar++，4)，它将使a增加两次。

JavaScript八进制转换“特性”是一个很好的了解:

parseInt('06') // 6
parseInt('07') // 7
parseInt('08') // 0
parseInt('09') // 0
parseInt('10') // 10

详情请点击这里。

Haskell's use of Maybe and Just. Maybe a is a type constructor that returns a type of Just a, but Maybe Int won't accept just an Int, it requires it to be a Just Int or Nothing. So in essence in haskell parlance Just Int is about as much of an Int as an apple is an orange. The only connection is that Just 5 returns a type of Maybe Interger, which can be constructed with the function Just and an Integer argument. This makes sense but is about as hard to explain as it can theoretically be, which is the purpose of haskell right? So is Just really JustKindaLikeButNotAtAll yea sorta, and is Maybe really a KindaLooksLikeOrIsNothing, yea sorta again.

-- Create a function that returns a Maybe Int, and return a 5, which know is definitly Int'able
>  let x :: Maybe Int; x = 5;
<interactive>:1:24:
    No instance for (Num (Maybe Int))
      arising from the literal `5' at <interactive>:1:24
    Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num (Maybe Int))
    In the expression: 5
    In the definition of `x': x = 5

>  Just 5  
Just 5
it :: Maybe Integer

    -- Create a function x which takes an Int
>  let x :: Int -> Int; x _ = 0;
x :: Int -> Int
-- Try to give it a Just Int
>  x $ Just 5                   

<interactive>:1:4:
    Couldn't match expected type `Int' against inferred type `Maybe t'
    In the second argument of `($)', namely `Just 5'
    In the expression: x $ Just 5
    In the definition of `it': it = x $ Just 5

祝你好运读到这篇文章，我希望它是正确的。

在Bash中，变量可以显示为标量和数组:

$ a=3
$ echo $a
3
$ echo ${a[@]}    # treat it like an array
3
$ declare -p a    # but it's not
declare -- a="3"
$ a[1]=4          # treat it like an array
$ echo $a         # acts like it's scalar
3
$ echo ${a[@]}    # but it's not
3 4
$ declare -p a
declare -a a='([0]="3" [1]="4")'
$ a=5             # treat it like a scalar
$ echo $a         # acts like it's scalar
5
$ echo ${a[@]}    # but it's not
5 4
$ declare -p a
declare -a a='([0]="5" [1]="4")'

KSH做同样的事情，但是使用排版而不是声明。

当你在zsh中这样做时，你得到的是子字符串赋值而不是数组:

$ a=3
$ a[2]=4          # zsh is one-indexed by default
$ echo $a
34
$ a[3]=567
$ echo $a
34567
$ a[3]=9
$ echo $a
34967
$ a[3]=123         # here it overwrites the first character, but inserts the others
$ echo $a
3412367
$ a=(1 2 3)
$ echo $a
1 2 3              # it's an array without needing to use ${a[@]} (but it will work)
$ a[2]=99          # what about assignments?
$ echo $a
1 99 3

Haskell又说:

在Haskell中，你可以处理任意大小的文件，就好像它是一个简单的字符串。只有在实际使用字符串时，文件才会被读取。由于Haskell令人难以置信的懒惰，这样的程序将在恒定的空间中运行，而不管文件的大小:

main = interact (>>= \x -> if x == '\n' then "\r\n" else [x])

(这个程序将一个文件从stdin转换为stdout，并将LF替换为CRLF，交互函数将整个stdin输入到一个函数，并将输出移动到stdout。)

这种惰性也可能导致问题，因为如果关闭一个文件句柄，就不能完全shure，不管Haskell是否已经解析了其中的所有数据。