这里，myThing变量是私有的，是闭包的一部分:

class Person {
  constructor() {

    var myThing = "Hello World";

    return {
      thing: myThing,
      sayThing: this.sayThing
    }
  }

  sayThing() {
    console.log(this.thing);
  }
}

var person = new Person();

console.log(person);

不同的“私人”方式

Instead of fighting against the fact that private visibility is currently unavailable in ES6, I decided to take a more practical approach that does just fine if your IDE supports JSDoc (e.g., Webstorm). The idea is to use the @private tag. As far as development goes, the IDE will prevent you from accessing any private member from outside its class. Works pretty well for me and it's been really useful for hiding internal methods so the auto-complete feature shows me just what the class really meant to expose. Here's an example:

我认为Benjamin的答案在大多数情况下可能是最好的，直到语言本身支持显式私有变量。

但是，如果出于某种原因需要阻止使用object . getownpropertysymbols()进行访问，我考虑使用的一种方法是附加一个惟一的、不可配置的、不可枚举的、不可写的属性，可以将其用作构造中的每个对象的属性标识符(例如惟一的Symbol，如果您还没有其他一些惟一的属性，如id)。然后使用该标识符保存每个对象的“私有”变量的映射。

const privateVars = {};

class Something {
    constructor(){
        Object.defineProperty(this, '_sym', {
            configurable: false,
            enumerable: false,
            writable: false,
            value: Symbol()
        });

        var myPrivateVars = {
            privateProperty: "I'm hidden"
        };

        privateVars[this._sym] = myPrivateVars;

        this.property = "I'm public";
    }

    getPrivateProperty() {
        return privateVars[this._sym].privateProperty;
    }

    // A clean up method of some kind is necessary since the
    // variables won't be cleaned up from memory automatically
    // when the object is garbage collected
    destroy() {
        delete privateVars[this._sym];
    }
}

var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "I'm public"
console.log(instance.privateProperty); //=> undefined
console.log(instance.getPrivateProperty()); //=> "I'm hidden"

与使用WeakMap相比，这种方法的潜在优势是，如果需要考虑性能，则访问时间更快。

哦，这么多奇异的解决方案!我通常不关心隐私，所以我使用“伪隐私”，正如这里所说的。但如果确实关心(如果有一些特殊的要求)，我会在这个例子中使用:

class jobImpl{
  // public
  constructor(name){
    this.name = name;
  }
  // public
  do(time){
    console.log(`${this.name} started at ${time}`);
    this.prepare();
    this.execute();
  }
  //public
  stop(time){
    this.finish();
    console.log(`${this.name} finished at ${time}`);
  }
  // private
  prepare(){ console.log('prepare..'); }
  // private
  execute(){ console.log('execute..'); }
  // private
  finish(){ console.log('finish..'); }
}

function Job(name){
  var impl = new jobImpl(name);
  return {
    do: time => impl.do(time),
    stop: time => impl.stop(time)
  };
}

// Test:
// create class "Job"
var j = new Job("Digging a ditch");
// call public members..
j.do("08:00am");
j.stop("06:00pm");

// try to call private members or fields..
console.log(j.name); // undefined
j.execute(); // error

函数(构造函数)的另一种可能实现:

function Job(name){
  var impl = new jobImpl(name);
  this.do = time => impl.do(time),
  this.stop = time => impl.stop(time)
}

答案是“不”。但是你可以像这样创建对属性的私有访问:

使用模块。模块中的所有内容都是私有的，除非使用export关键字将其设为公有。 在模块内部，使用函数闭包:http://www.kirupa.com/html5/closures_in_javascript.htm

(可以使用符号来确保隐私的建议在ES6规范的早期版本中是正确的，但现在不再是这样:https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2014-January/035604.html和https://stackoverflow.com/a/22280202/1282216。有关符号和隐私的详细讨论，请参阅:https://curiosity-driven.org/private-properties-in-javascript)

来这个派对很晚，但我在搜索中碰到了OP问题，所以… 是的，您可以通过将类声明包装在闭包中来拥有私有属性

这里有一个我如何在这个代码依赖中拥有私有方法的例子。在下面的代码片段中，Subscribable类有两个“私有”函数process和processCallbacks。任何属性都可以以这种方式添加，并且通过使用闭包将它们保持为私有。如果关注点被很好地分离，并且Javascript不需要通过添加更多的语法而变得臃肿，当闭包整齐地完成工作时，隐私是一个罕见的需求。

const Subscribable = (function(){

  const process = (self, eventName, args) => {
    self.processing.set(eventName, setTimeout(() => processCallbacks(self, eventName, args)))};

  const processCallbacks = (self, eventName, args) => {
    if (self.callingBack.get(eventName).length > 0){
      const [nextCallback, ...callingBack] = self.callingBack.get(eventName);
      self.callingBack.set(eventName, callingBack);
      process(self, eventName, args);
      nextCallback(...args)}
    else {
      delete self.processing.delete(eventName)}};

  return class {
    constructor(){
      this.callingBack = new Map();
      this.processing = new Map();
      this.toCallbacks = new Map()}

    subscribe(eventName, callback){
      const callbacks = this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback);
      this.toCallbacks.set(eventName,  [...callbacks, callback]);
      return () => this.unsubscribe(eventName, callback)}  // callable to unsubscribe for convenience

    unsubscribe(eventName, callback){
      let callbacks = this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || [];
      callbacks = callbacks.filter(subscribedCallback => subscribedCallback !== callback);
      if (callbacks.length > 0) {
        this.toCallbacks.set(eventName, callbacks)}
      else {
        this.toCallbacks.delete(eventName)}
      return callbacks}

    emit(eventName, ...args){
      this.callingBack.set(eventName, this.toCallbacks.get(eventName) || []);
      if (!this.processing.has(eventName)){
        process(this, eventName, args)}}}})();

我喜欢这种方法，因为它很好地分离了关注点，并保持了真正的私密性。唯一的缺点是需要使用'self'(或类似的东西)在私有内容中引用'this'。