是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
是否可以在ES6类中创建私有属性?
举个例子。 如何阻止访问instance.property?
class Something {
constructor(){
this.property = "test";
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
当前回答
class Something {
constructor(){
var _property = "test";
Object.defineProperty(this, "property", {
get: function(){ return _property}
});
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
instance.property = "can read from outside, but can't write";
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
其他回答
这取决于你问谁:-)
最大最小类提案中没有包含私有属性修饰符,这似乎已经进入了当前的草案。
但是,可能会支持私有名称,它允许私有属性—而且它们可能也可以用于类定义中。
我现在听到的建议是使用WeakMaps来保存私人数据,以供其他看客参考。
下面是一个更清晰、有效的例子:
function storePrivateProperties(a, b, c, d) {
let privateData = new WeakMap;
// unique object as key, weak map can only accept object as key, when key is no longer referened, garbage collector claims the key-value
let keyA = {}, keyB = {}, keyC = {}, keyD = {};
privateData.set(keyA, a);
privateData.set(keyB, b);
privateData.set(keyC, c);
privateData.set(keyD, d);
return {
logPrivateKey(key) {
switch(key) {
case "a":
console.log(privateData.get(keyA));
break;
case "b":
console.log(privateData.get(keyB));
break;
case "c":
console.log(privateData.get(keyC));
break;
case "d":
console.log(privateData.set(keyD));
break;
default:
console.log(`There is no value for ${key}`)
}
}
}
}
class Something {
constructor(){
var _property = "test";
Object.defineProperty(this, "property", {
get: function(){ return _property}
});
}
}
var instance = new Something();
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
instance.property = "can read from outside, but can't write";
console.log(instance.property); //=> "test"
哦,这么多奇异的解决方案!我通常不关心隐私,所以我使用“伪隐私”,正如这里所说的。但如果确实关心(如果有一些特殊的要求),我会在这个例子中使用:
class jobImpl{
// public
constructor(name){
this.name = name;
}
// public
do(time){
console.log(`${this.name} started at ${time}`);
this.prepare();
this.execute();
}
//public
stop(time){
this.finish();
console.log(`${this.name} finished at ${time}`);
}
// private
prepare(){ console.log('prepare..'); }
// private
execute(){ console.log('execute..'); }
// private
finish(){ console.log('finish..'); }
}
function Job(name){
var impl = new jobImpl(name);
return {
do: time => impl.do(time),
stop: time => impl.stop(time)
};
}
// Test:
// create class "Job"
var j = new Job("Digging a ditch");
// call public members..
j.do("08:00am");
j.stop("06:00pm");
// try to call private members or fields..
console.log(j.name); // undefined
j.execute(); // error
函数(构造函数)的另一种可能实现:
function Job(name){
var impl = new jobImpl(name);
this.do = time => impl.do(time),
this.stop = time => impl.stop(time)
}
我有一个解决办法,它很简单…虽然性能不是问题…但它确实有效,而且效果很好。
诀窍在于,在私有属性和函数被建立和标准化/采用之前,需要另一种解决方案,这是另一种解决方案…
class ClassPrivateProperties {
constructor(instance) {
const $this = instance;
let properties = {};
this.prop = (key, value = undefined) => {
if (!value) {
return properties[key];
} else {
properties[key] = value;
}
};
this.clear = instance => {
if ($this === instance) {
properties = {};
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
}
}
这是一个示例用法,可以是什么(如果你使用上面的感觉自由,使它更好)
class Test {
constructor() {
this._privateProps = new ClassPrivateProperties(this);
}
property(key, value = undefined) {
if (!value) {
return this._privateProps.prop(key);
} else {
this._privateProps.prop(key, value);
}
}
clear() { return this._privateProps.clear(this); }
}
const test = new test;
test.property('myKey','some value here');
console.log(test.property('myKey'));
就像我提到的,这个问题不是最好的,但它工作,使属性真正的私有。