有时,我需要在放弃之前将一个操作重试几次。我的代码是:

int retries = 3;
while(true) {
  try {
    DoSomething();
    break; // success!
  } catch {
    if(--retries == 0) throw;
    else Thread.Sleep(1000);
  }
}

我想在一个通用的重试函数中重写这个:

TryThreeTimes(DoSomething);

这在c#中可行吗?TryThreeTimes()方法的代码是什么?


当前回答

重试助手:一个通用的java实现,它包含可返回类型和无效类型的重试。

import java.util.function.Supplier;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;

public class RetryHelper {
  private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(RetryHelper.class);
  private int retryWaitInMS;
  private int maxRetries;

  public RetryHelper() {
    this.retryWaitInMS = 300;
    this.maxRetries = 3;
  }

  public RetryHelper(int maxRetry) {
    this.maxRetries = maxRetry;
    this.retryWaitInMS = 300;
  }

  public RetryHelper(int retryWaitInSeconds, int maxRetry) {
    this.retryWaitInMS = retryWaitInSeconds;
    this.maxRetries = maxRetry;
  }

  public <T> T retryAndReturn(Supplier<T> supplier) {
    try {
      return supplier.get();
    } catch (Exception var3) {
      return this.retrySupplier(supplier);
    }
  }

  public void retry(Runnable runnable) {
    try {
      runnable.run();
    } catch (Exception var3) {
      this.retrySupplier(() -> {
        runnable.run();
        return null;
      });
    }

  }

  private <T> T retrySupplier(Supplier<T> supplier) {
    log.error("Failed <TASK>, will be retried " + this.maxRetries + " times.");
    int retryCounter = 0;

    while(retryCounter < this.maxRetries) {
      try {
        return supplier.get();
      } catch (Exception var6) {
        ++retryCounter;
        log.error("<TASK> failed on retry: " + retryCounter + " of " + this.maxRetries + " with error: " + var6.getMessage());
        if (retryCounter >= this.maxRetries) {
          log.error("Max retries exceeded.");
          throw var6;
        }

        try {
          Thread.sleep((long)this.retryWaitInMS);
        } catch (InterruptedException var5) {
          var5.printStackTrace();
        }
      }
    }

    return supplier.get();
  }

  public int getRetryWaitInMS() {
    return this.retryWaitInMS;
  }

  public int getMaxRetries() {
    return this.maxRetries;
  }
}

用法:

    try {
      returnValue = new RetryHelper().retryAndReturn(() -> performSomeTask(args));
      //or no return type:
      new RetryHelper().retry(() -> mytask(args));
    } catch(Exception ex){
      log.error(e.getMessage());
      throw new CustomException();
    }

其他回答

public delegate void ThingToTryDeletage();

public static void TryNTimes(ThingToTryDelegate, int N, int sleepTime)
{
   while(true)
   {
      try
      {
        ThingToTryDelegate();
      } catch {

            if( --N == 0) throw;
          else Thread.Sleep(time);          
      }
}

用波利

https://github.com/App-vNext/Polly-Samples

这是我和波莉一起用的试药

public T Retry<T>(Func<T> action, int retryCount = 0)
{
    PolicyResult<T> policyResult = Policy
     .Handle<Exception>()
     .Retry(retryCount)
     .ExecuteAndCapture<T>(action);

    if (policyResult.Outcome == OutcomeType.Failure)
    {
        throw policyResult.FinalException;
    }

    return policyResult.Result;
}

像这样使用它

var result = Retry(() => MyFunction()), 3);

我需要一个支持取消的方法,在此过程中,我添加了返回中间故障的支持。

public static class ThreadUtils
{
    public static RetryResult Retry(
        Action target,
        CancellationToken cancellationToken,
        int timeout = 5000,
        int retries = 0)
    {
        CheckRetryParameters(timeout, retries)
        var failures = new List<Exception>();
        while(!cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested)
        {
            try
            {
                target();
                return new RetryResult(failures);
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                failures.Add(ex);
            }

            if (retries > 0)
            {
                retries--;
                if (retries == 0)
                {
                    throw new AggregateException(
                     "Retry limit reached, see InnerExceptions for details.",
                     failures);
                }
            }

            if (cancellationToken.WaitHandle.WaitOne(timeout))
            {
                break;
            }
        }

        failures.Add(new OperationCancelledException(
            "The Retry Operation was cancelled."));
        throw new AggregateException("Retry was cancelled.", failures);
    }

    private static void CheckRetryParameters(int timeout, int retries)
    {
        if (timeout < 1)
        {
            throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(...
        }

        if (retries < 0)
        {
            throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(...

        }
    }

    public class RetryResult : IEnumerable<Exception>
    {
        private readonly IEnumerable<Exception> failureExceptions;
        private readonly int failureCount;

         protected internal RetryResult(
             ICollection<Exception> failureExceptions)
         {
             this.failureExceptions = failureExceptions;
             this.failureCount = failureExceptions.Count;
         }
    }

    public int FailureCount
    {
        get { return this.failureCount; }
    }

    public IEnumerator<Exception> GetEnumerator()
    {
        return this.failureExceptions.GetEnumerator();
    }

    System.Collections.IEnumerator 
        System.Collections.IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
    {
        return this.GetEnumerator();
    }
}

您可以像这样使用重试功能,重试3次,延迟10秒,但不会取消。

try
{
    var result = ThreadUtils.Retry(
        SomeAction, 
        CancellationToken.None,
        10000,
        3);

    // it worked
    result.FailureCount // but failed this many times first.
}
catch (AggregationException ex)
{
   // oops, 3 retries wasn't enough.
}

或者,除非取消,否则每隔5秒永远重试一次。

try
{
    var result = ThreadUtils.Retry(
        SomeAction, 
        someTokenSource.Token);

    // it worked
    result.FailureCount // but failed this many times first.
}
catch (AggregationException ex)
{
   // operation was cancelled before success.
}

正如您可以猜到的那样,在我的源代码中,我重载了Retry函数,以支持我希望使用的不同委托类型。

这可能是个坏主意。首先,这是一句格言的象征:“疯狂的定义是做同一件事两次,每次都期待不同的结果”。其次,这种编码模式本身不能很好地组合。例如:

假设您的网络硬件层在失败时重发一个数据包三次,在两次失败之间等待一秒钟。

现在假设软件层在包失败时重发关于失败的通知三次。

现在假设通知层在通知传递失败时重新激活通知三次。

现在假设错误报告层在通知失败时重新激活通知层三次。

现在假设web服务器在错误失败时重新激活错误报告三次。

现在假设web客户端在从服务器得到错误后重新发送请求三次。

现在假设网络交换机上用来将通知路由到管理员的线路被拔掉。web客户端的用户什么时候最终得到错误消息?我大约12分钟后到。

以免您认为这只是一个愚蠢的例子:我们已经在客户代码中看到了这个错误,尽管比我在这里描述的要严重得多。在特定的客户代码中,错误条件发生和最终报告给用户之间的间隔是几个星期,因为有很多层自动重试并等待。想象一下,如果是十次而不是三次,会发生什么。

通常正确的处理错误的方法是立即报告它,让用户决定怎么做。如果用户想要创建自动重试的策略,让他们在软件抽象的适当级别上创建该策略。

使用c# 6.0保持简单

public async Task<T> Retry<T>(Func<T> action, TimeSpan retryInterval, int retryCount)
{
    try
    {
        return action();
    }
    catch when (retryCount != 0)
    {
        await Task.Delay(retryInterval);
        return await Retry(action, retryInterval, --retryCount);
    }
}