阅读Paul Graham关于编程语言的文章,你可能会认为Lisp宏是唯一的选择。作为一个忙碌的开发人员,在其他平台上工作,我还没有使用Lisp宏的特权。作为一个想要了解热门话题的人,请解释一下是什么让这个功能如此强大。
请将这一点与我从Python、Java、c#或C开发世界中理解的东西联系起来。
阅读Paul Graham关于编程语言的文章,你可能会认为Lisp宏是唯一的选择。作为一个忙碌的开发人员,在其他平台上工作,我还没有使用Lisp宏的特权。作为一个想要了解热门话题的人,请解释一下是什么让这个功能如此强大。
请将这一点与我从Python、Java、c#或C开发世界中理解的东西联系起来。
当前回答
我从通用的lisp烹饪书中得到了这个,我认为它解释了为什么lisp宏是有用的。
宏是一段普通的Lisp代码,它对另一段假定的Lisp代码进行操作,将其翻译成(更接近于)可执行的Lisp。这听起来可能有点复杂,所以让我们举一个简单的例子。假设您想要一个版本的setq,将两个变量设置为相同的值。所以如果你写
(setq2 x y (+ z 3))
当z=8时,x和y都被设为11。(我想不出这有什么用,但这只是一个例子。)
It should be obvious that we can't define setq2 as a function. If x=50 and y=-5, this function would receive the values 50, -5, and 11; it would have no knowledge of what variables were supposed to be set. What we really want to say is, When you (the Lisp system) see (setq2 v1 v2 e), treat it as equivalent to (progn (setq v1 e) (setq v2 e)). Actually, this isn't quite right, but it will do for now. A macro allows us to do precisely this, by specifying a program for transforming the input pattern (setq2 v1 v2 e)" into the output pattern (progn ...)."
如果你觉得这很好,你可以继续读下去: http://cl-cookbook.sourceforge.net/macros.html
其他回答
您将在这里找到关于lisp宏的全面辩论。
这篇文章的一个有趣的子集:
In most programming languages, syntax is complex. Macros have to take apart program syntax, analyze it, and reassemble it. They do not have access to the program's parser, so they have to depend on heuristics and best-guesses. Sometimes their cut-rate analysis is wrong, and then they break. But Lisp is different. Lisp macros do have access to the parser, and it is a really simple parser. A Lisp macro is not handed a string, but a preparsed piece of source code in the form of a list, because the source of a Lisp program is not a string; it is a list. And Lisp programs are really good at taking apart lists and putting them back together. They do this reliably, every day. Here is an extended example. Lisp has a macro, called "setf", that performs assignment. The simplest form of setf is (setf x whatever) which sets the value of the symbol "x" to the value of the expression "whatever". Lisp also has lists; you can use the "car" and "cdr" functions to get the first element of a list or the rest of the list, respectively. Now what if you want to replace the first element of a list with a new value? There is a standard function for doing that, and incredibly, its name is even worse than "car". It is "rplaca". But you do not have to remember "rplaca", because you can write (setf (car somelist) whatever) to set the car of somelist. What is really happening here is that "setf" is a macro. At compile time, it examines its arguments, and it sees that the first one has the form (car SOMETHING). It says to itself "Oh, the programmer is trying to set the car of somthing. The function to use for that is 'rplaca'." And it quietly rewrites the code in place to: (rplaca somelist whatever)
简而言之,宏是代码的转换。它们允许引入许多新的语法结构。例如,考虑c#中的LINQ。在lisp中,有类似的由宏实现的语言扩展(例如,内置循环构造,迭代)。宏显著地减少了代码重复。宏允许嵌入«小语言»(例如,在c#/java中可以使用xml进行配置,在lisp中可以使用宏实现同样的事情)。宏可能隐藏使用库的困难。
例如,在lisp中你可以写
(iter (for (id name) in-clsql-query "select id, name from users" on-database *users-database*)
(format t "User with ID of ~A has name ~A.~%" id name))
这隐藏了所有数据库的东西(事务,正确的连接关闭,获取数据等),而在c#中,这需要创建SqlConnections, SqlCommands,将SqlParameters添加到SqlCommands,在SqlDataReaders上循环,正确地关闭它们。
想想在C或c++中可以用宏和模板做什么。它们是管理重复代码的非常有用的工具,但它们在相当严重的方面受到限制。
有限的宏/模板语法限制了它们的使用。例如,不能编写扩展为类或函数以外内容的模板。宏和模板不容易维护内部数据。 C和c++复杂且不规则的语法使得编写非常通用的宏非常困难。
Lisp和Lisp宏解决了这些问题。
Lisp宏是用Lisp编写的。您拥有Lisp的全部功能来编写宏。 Lisp有一个非常规则的语法。
与任何精通c++的人交谈,问他们花了多长时间来学习模板元编程所需的所有模板。或者是《现代c++设计》等(优秀)书籍中的所有疯狂技巧,尽管语言已经标准化了10年,但这些技巧仍然很难调试,而且(在实践中)无法在真实的编译器之间移植。如果用于元编程的语言与用于编程的语言相同,那么所有这些问题都消失了!
我认为我从来没有见过比这个家伙解释得更好的Lisp宏:http://www.defmacro.org/ramblings/lisp.html
Lisp宏允许您决定何时(如果有的话)对任何部分或表达式求值。举个简单的例子,想想C语言:
expr1 && expr2 && expr3 ...
它说的是:计算expr1,并且,如果它是正确的,计算expr2,等等。
现在试着把这个&&变成一个函数…没错,你不能。像这样调用:
and(expr1, expr2, expr3)
将在产生答案之前评估所有三个表达式,而不管expr1是否为假!
使用lisp宏,你可以编写如下代码:
(defmacro && (expr1 &rest exprs)
`(if ,expr1 ;` Warning: I have not tested
(&& ,@exprs) ; this and might be wrong!
nil))
现在你有一个&&,你可以像函数一样调用它,它不会计算你传递给它的任何表单,除非它们都为真。
要了解这是如何有用的,请进行对比:
(&& (very-cheap-operation)
(very-expensive-operation)
(operation-with-serious-side-effects))
and:
and(very_cheap_operation(),
very_expensive_operation(),
operation_with_serious_side_effects());
你可以用宏做的其他事情是创建新的关键字和/或迷你语言(例如,查看(loop…)宏),将其他语言集成到lisp中,例如,你可以编写一个宏,让你这样说:
(setvar *rows* (sql select count(*)
from some-table
where column1 = "Yes"
and column2 like "some%string%")
这还没有涉及到Reader宏。
希望这能有所帮助。