我在比特和字节中跌跌撞撞，创建了一个扩展，后来我发现它与@rintaro的答案非常相似。它是这样使用的:

enum E : EnumCollection {
    case A, B, C
}

Array(E.cases())    // [A, B, C]

值得注意的是，它可以在任何没有关联值的enum上使用。注意，这对于没有大小写的枚举不起作用。

与@rintaro的答案一样，这段代码使用枚举的底层表示。这种表示没有文档化，将来可能会改变，这会破坏它。我不建议在生产中使用这种方法。

代码(Swift 2.2, Xcode 7.3.1，不工作在Xcode 10):

protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
    static func cases() -> AnySequence<Self> {
        typealias S = Self
        return AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
            var raw = 0
            return AnyGenerator {
                let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
                guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
                raw += 1
                return current
            }
        }
    }
}

代码(Swift 3, Xcode 8.1，不工作在Xcode 10):

protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
    static func cases() -> AnySequence<Self> {
        typealias S = Self
        return AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<S> in
            var raw = 0
            return AnyIterator {
                let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(to: &raw) { $0.withMemoryRebound(to: S.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee } }
                guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
                raw += 1
                return current
            }
        }
    }
}

我不知道为什么我需要typealias，但编译器抱怨没有它。

这篇文章是相关的https://www.swift-studies.com/blog/2014/6/10/enumerating-enums-in-swift

基本上，提议的解决方案是

enum ProductCategory : String {
     case Washers = "washers", Dryers = "dryers", Toasters = "toasters"

     static let allValues = [Washers, Dryers, Toasters]
}

for category in ProductCategory.allValues{
     //Do something
}

编辑: 快速进化提案SE-0194枚举案例派生集合为这个问题提出了一个水平的解决方案。我们在Swift 4.2和更新版本中看到了它。该提案还指出了一些变通方法，这些方法与这里已经提到的一些方法类似，但可能会很有趣。

为了完整起见，我也会保留我原来的职位。

这是基于@Peymmankh的回答的另一种方法，适用于Swift 3。

public protocol EnumCollection: Hashable {}

extension EnumCollection {

public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
    typealias S = Self

    let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyIterator<S> in
        var raw = 0
        return AnyIterator {
            let current = withUnsafePointer(to: &raw) {
                 $0.withMemoryRebound(to: S.self, capacity: 1) { $0.pointee }
            }
            guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
            raw += 1
            return current
        }
    }

    return [S](retVal)
}

我发现了一种有点俗气但更安全的方法，它不需要键入两次值或引用枚举值的内存，因此不太可能损坏。

基本上，与其使用枚举，不如创建一个具有单个实例的结构体，并将所有enum-values设置为常量。然后可以使用Mirror查询变量

public struct Suit{

    // the values
    let spades = "♠"
    let hearts = "♥"
    let diamonds = "♦"
    let clubs = "♣"

    // make a single instance of the Suit struct, Suit.instance
    struct SStruct{static var instance: Suit = Suit()}
    static var instance : Suit{
        get{return SStruct.instance}
        set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
    }

    // an array with all of the raw values
    static var allValues: [String]{
        var values = [String]()

        let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: Suit.instance)
        for (_, v) in mirror.children{
            guard let suit = v as? String else{continue}
            values.append(suit)
        }

        return values
    }
}

如果使用此方法，则需要使用Suit.instance.clubs或Suit.instance.spades来获取单个值

但所有这些都太无聊了……让我们做一些事情，使它更像一个真正的enum!

public struct SuitType{

    // store multiple things for each suit
    let spades = Suit("♠", order: 4)
    let hearts = Suit("♥", order: 3)
    let diamonds = Suit("♦", order: 2)
    let clubs = Suit("♣", order: 1)

    struct SStruct{static var instance: SuitType = SuitType()}
    static var instance : SuitType{
        get{return SStruct.instance}
        set{SStruct.instance = newValue}
    }

    // a dictionary mapping the raw values to the values
    static var allValuesDictionary: [String : Suit]{
        var values = [String : Suit]()

        let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
        for (_, v) in mirror.children{
            guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
            values[suit.rawValue] = suit
        }

        return values
    }
}

public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
    public var rawValue: String
    public typealias RawValue = String

    public var hashValue: Int{
        // find some integer that can be used to uniquely identify
        // each value. In this case, we could have used the order
        // variable because it is a unique value, yet to make this
        // apply to more cases, the hash table address of rawValue
        // will be returned, which should work in almost all cases
        // 
        // you could also add a hashValue parameter to init() and
        // give each suit a different hash value
        return rawValue.hash
    }

    public var order: Int
    public init(_ value: String, order: Int){
        self.rawValue = value
        self.order = order
    }

    // an array of all of the Suit values
    static var allValues: [Suit]{
        var values = [Suit]()

        let mirror = Mirror(reflecting: SuitType.instance)
        for (_, v) in mirror.children{
            guard let suit = v as? Suit else{continue}
            values.append(suit)
        }

        return values
    }

    // allows for using Suit(rawValue: "♦"), like a normal enum
    public init?(rawValue: String){
        // get the Suit from allValuesDictionary in SuitType, or return nil if that raw value doesn't exist
        guard let suit = SuitType.allValuesDictionary[rawValue] else{return nil}
        // initialize a new Suit with the same properties as that with the same raw value
        self.init(suit.rawValue, order: suit.order)
    }
}

你现在可以做

let allSuits: [Suit] = Suit.allValues

or

for suit in Suit.allValues{
   print("The suit \(suit.rawValue) has the order \(suit.order)")
}

然而，要获得一个单一，你仍然需要使用SuitType.instance.spades或SuitType.instance.hearts。为了更加直观，您可以向Suit添加一些允许您使用Suit.type的代码。*而不是SuitType.instance.*

public struct Suit: RawRepresentable, Hashable{
   // ...your code...

   static var type = SuitType.instance

   // ...more of your code...
}

您现在可以使用Suit.type.diamonds而不是SuitType.instance。diamonds，或者Suit.type.clubs而不是SuitType.instance.clubs

enum Rank: Int
{
    case Ace = 0
    case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seve, Eight, Nine, Ten
    case Jack, Queen, King
    case Count
}

enum Suit : Int
{
    case Spades = 0
    case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
    case Count
}

struct Card
{
    var rank:Rank
    var suit:Suit
}

class Test
{
    func makeDeck() -> Card[]
    {
        let suitsCount:Int = Suit.Count.toRaw()
        let rankCount:Int = Rank.Count.toRaw()
        let repeatedCard:Card = Card(rank:Rank.Ace, suit:Suit.Spades)
        let deck:Card[] = Card[](count:suitsCount*rankCount, repeatedValue:repeatedCard)

        for i:Int in 0..rankCount
        {
            for j:Int in 0..suitsCount
            {
                deck[i*suitsCount+j] = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(i)!, suit: Suit.fromRaw(j)!)
            }
        }
        return deck
    }
}

根据Rick的回答:这要快5倍

我使用计算属性，它返回所有值的数组(感谢这篇文章http://natecook.com/blog/2014/10/loopy-random-enum-ideas/)。但是，它也使用int原始值，但我不需要在单独的属性中重复枚举的所有成员。

Xcode 6.1在如何使用rawValue获取enum成员方面做了一点改变，所以我修正了listing。还修复了第一个rawValue错误的小错误。

enum ValidSuits: Int {
    case Clubs = 0, Spades, Hearts, Diamonds
    func description() -> String {
        switch self {
        case .Clubs:
            return "♣︎"
        case .Spades:
            return "♠︎"
        case .Diamonds:
            return "♦︎"
        case .Hearts:
            return "♥︎"
        }
    }

    static var allSuits: [ValidSuits] {
        return Array(
            SequenceOf {
                () -> GeneratorOf<ValidSuits> in
                var i=0
                return GeneratorOf<ValidSuits> {
                    return ValidSuits(rawValue: i++)
                }
            }
        )
    }
}