有几种方法可以做到。我通常会使用这样的方法:

long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
// ... do something ...
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();

或者System.nanoTime();

关于基准测试方面的更多内容，似乎还有这个:http://jetm.void.fm/但从未尝试过。

非常好的代码。

http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0585.html

import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;

long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
........
........
........
long finishTime = System.currentTimeMillis();

String diff = millisToShortDHMS(finishTime - startTime);


  /**
   * converts time (in milliseconds) to human-readable format
   *  "<dd:>hh:mm:ss"
   */
  public static String millisToShortDHMS(long duration) {
    String res = "";
    long days  = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toDays(duration);
    long hours = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toHours(duration)
                   - TimeUnit.DAYS.toHours(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toDays(duration));
    long minutes = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(duration)
                     - TimeUnit.HOURS.toMinutes(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toHours(duration));
    long seconds = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toSeconds(duration)
                   - TimeUnit.MINUTES.toSeconds(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.toMinutes(duration));
    if (days == 0) {
      res = String.format("%02d:%02d:%02d", hours, minutes, seconds);
    }
    else {
      res = String.format("%dd%02d:%02d:%02d", days, hours, minutes, seconds);
    }
    return res;
  }

如果您不使用工具，并且希望对执行时间较短的方法进行计时，那么只需执行多次，每次将执行次数增加一倍，直到达到1秒左右。因此，系统调用的时间。纳米时间等，也没有系统的准确性。nanoTime确实对结果有很大影响。

    int runs = 0, runsPerRound = 10;
    long begin = System.nanoTime(), end;
    do {
        for (int i=0; i<runsPerRound; ++i) timedMethod();
        end = System.nanoTime();
        runs += runsPerRound;
        runsPerRound *= 2;
    } while (runs < Integer.MAX_VALUE / 2 && 1000000000L > end - begin);
    System.out.println("Time for timedMethod() is " + 
        0.000000001 * (end-begin) / runs + " seconds");

当然，使用挂钟也有一些注意事项:jit编译、多线程/进程等的影响。因此，您需要首先执行该方法很多次，以便JIT编译器完成它的工作，然后重复此测试多次，并使用最短的执行时间。

在我的机器上进行性能测量

System.nanoTime(): 750ns System.currentTimeMillis(): 18ns

如前所述，System.nanoTime()被认为是度量经过的时间。只要注意在循环中使用的代价就可以了。

你可以使用spring core项目中的stopwatch类:

代码:

StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch()
stopWatch.start();  //start stopwatch
// write your function or line of code.
stopWatch.stop();  //stop stopwatch
stopWatch.getTotalTimeMillis() ; ///get total time

Documentation for Stopwatch: Simple stop watch, allowing for timing of a number of tasks, exposing total running time and running time for each named task. Conceals use of System.currentTimeMillis(), improving the readability of application code and reducing the likelihood of calculation errors. Note that this object is not designed to be thread-safe and does not use synchronization. This class is normally used to verify performance during proof-of-concepts and in development, rather than as part of production applications.

为此，我们使用了AspectJ和Java注释。如果我们需要知道一个方法的执行时间，我们可以简单地注释它。更高级的版本可以使用自己的日志级别，可以在运行时启用和禁用。

public @interface Trace {
  boolean showParameters();
}

@Aspect
public class TraceAspect {
  [...]
  @Around("tracePointcut() && @annotation(trace) && !within(TraceAspect)")
  public Object traceAdvice ( ProceedingJintPoint jP, Trace trace ) {

    Object result;
    // initilize timer

    try { 
      result = jp.procced();
    } finally { 
      // calculate execution time 
    }

    return result;
  }
  [...]
}