yield关键字是c#中一直困扰我的关键字之一，我从来都不确定自己是否正确地使用了它。
在以下两段代码中，哪一段是首选的，为什么?
版本1:使用收益率
public static IEnumerable<Product> GetAllProducts()
{
using (AdventureWorksEntities db = new AdventureWorksEntities())
{
var products = from product in db.Product
select product;
foreach (Product product in products)
{
yield return product;
}
}
}
版本2:返回列表
public static IEnumerable<Product> GetAllProducts()
{
using (AdventureWorksEntities db = new AdventureWorksEntities())
{
var products = from product in db.Product
select product;
return products.ToList<Product>();
}
}
考虑到确切的两个代码片段，我认为版本1更好，因为它可以更有效。假设有很多产品，调用者希望将其转换为dto。
var dtos = GetAllProducts().Select(ConvertToDto).ToList();
在版本2中，首先创建一个Product对象列表，然后创建另一个ProductDto对象列表。版本1没有Product对象的列表，只构建了所需的ProductDto对象的列表。
Even without converting, Version 2 has a problem in my opinion: The list is returned as IEnumerable. The caller of GetAllProducts() does not know how expensive the enumeration of the result is. And if the caller needs to iterate more than once, she will probably materialize once by using ToList() (tools like ReSharper also suggest this). Which results in an unnecessary copy of the list already created in GetAllProducts(). So if Version 2 should be used, the return type should be List and not IEnumerable.
以下是Chris Sells在《c#程序设计语言》中讲述的语句;
I sometimes forget that yield return is not the same as return , in
that the code after a yield return can be executed. For example, the
code after the first return here can never be executed:
int F() {
return 1;
return 2; // Can never be executed
}
In contrast, the code after the first yield return here can be
executed:
IEnumerable<int> F() {
yield return 1;
yield return 2; // Can be executed
}
This often bites me in an if statement:
IEnumerable<int> F() {
if(...) {
yield return 1; // I mean this to be the only thing returned
}
yield return 2; // Oops!
}
In these cases, remembering that yield return is not “final” like
return is helpful.
