我发现Javascript Date Object对110年的热爱令人愉快。 试一试。

<Script language ="JavaScript">
<!--
var now = new Date()
var dia = now.getDay()
var mes = now.getMonth()
var fecha

//Day of the week
if(dia==0){
 fecha="Domingo, ";
}else if(dia==1){
 fecha="Lunes, ";
}else if(dia==2){
 fecha="Martes, ";
}else if(dia==3){
 fecha="Miércoles, ";
}else if(dia==4){
 fecha="Jueves, ";
}else if(dia==5){
 fecha="Viernes, ";
}else{
 fecha="Sábado, ";
}

fecha = fecha + now.getDate() + " de "
//Which month is it?
if(mes==0){
 fecha=fecha + "Enero"
}else if(mes==1){
 fecha=fecha + "Febrero"
}else if(mes==2){
 fecha=fecha + "Marzo"
}else if(mes==3){
 fecha=fecha + "Abril"
}else if(mes==4){
 fecha=fecha + "Mayo"
}else if(mes==5){
 fecha=fecha + "Junio"
}else if(mes==6){
 fecha=fecha + "Julio"
}else if(mes==7){
 fecha=fecha + "Agosto"
}else if(mes==8){
 fecha=fecha + "Septiembre"
}else if(mes==9){
 fecha=fecha + "Octubre"
}else if(mes==10){
 fecha=fecha + "Noviembre"
}else{
 fecha=fecha + "Diciembre"
}

//Year
fecha = fecha + " del " + now.getYear()

document.write(fecha);
//-->
</Script>

脚本是西班牙语-抱歉如果你不明白代码..这个想法是为了让你看到110年的结果。

在PHP中，如下:

<?php $foo = 'abc'; echo "{$foo";

是语法错误。

如果你真的想要{，后面跟着$foo的内容，你必须使用。:

<?php $foo = 'abc'; echo '{' . $foo;

在fortran中(当然是77，可能在95中也是如此)，未声明的变量和以I到N开头的参数(“In”组)将是INTEGER，所有其他未声明的变量和参数将是REAL(源)。这与“在某些情况下可选的空白”相结合，导致了最著名的错误之一。

正如弗雷德·韦伯在1990年的《另类民间传说:计算机》一书中所说:

I worked at Nasa during the summer of 1963. The group I was working in was doing preliminary work on the Mission Control Center computer systems and programs. My office mate had the job of testing out an orbit computation program which had been used during the Mercury flights. Running some test data with known answers through it, he was getting answers that were close, but not accurate enough. So, he started looking for numerical problems in the algorithm, checking to make sure his tests data was really correct, etc. After a couple of weeks with no results, he came across a DO statement, in the form: DO 10 I=1.10 This statement was interpreted by the compiler (correctly) as: DO10I = 1.10 The programmer had clearly intended: DO 10 I = 1, 10 After changing the . to a , the program results were correct to the desired accuracy. Apparently, the program's answers had been "good enough" for the sub-orbital Mercury flights, so no one suspected a bug until they tried to get greater accuracy, in anticipation of later orbital and moon flights. As far as I know, this particular bug was never blamed for any actual failure of a space flight, but the other details here seem close enough that I'm sure this incident is the source of the DO story.

我认为这是一个很大的WTF，如果DO10I被作为DO10I，并且反过来，因为隐式声明被认为是类型REAL。这是个很棒的故事。

在c++中，你可以做:

std::string my_str;
std::string my_str_concat = my_str + "foo";

但你不能:

std::string my_str_concat = "foo" + my_str;

操作符重载通常服从WTF。

c#中的“动态”。

因为智能感知、类型安全和决定论会随着“动态”关键字的第一次使用而立即消失，因此所有必须与RAD或python受害者一起工作的人的日子都被毁了。

Java有一整本关于它们的书。

书http://www.javapuzzlers.com/lg-puzzlers-cropped.jpg

爪哇益智游戏