在寻找“类的私有数据”的最佳实践时，我偶然看到了这篇文章。上面提到了一些模式会有性能问题。

我根据在线书籍“探索ES6”中的4个主要模式整理了一些jsperf测试:

http://exploringjs.com/es6/ch_classes.html#sec_private-data-for-classes

测试可以在这里找到:

https://jsperf.com/private-data-for-classes

在Chrome 63.0.3239 / Mac OS X 10.11.6中，表现最好的模式是“通过构造函数环境的私有数据”和“通过命名约定的私有数据”。对我来说，Safari在WeakMap上表现得很好，而Chrome则不太好。

我不知道对内存的影响，但“构造函数环境”的模式(有些人曾警告过这将是一个性能问题)非常具有性能。

这4种基本模式是:

通过构造函数环境的私有数据

class Countdown {
    constructor(counter, action) {
        Object.assign(this, {
            dec() {
                if (counter < 1) return;
                counter--;
                if (counter === 0) {
                    action();
                }
            }
        });
    }
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();

通过构造函数环境的私有数据2

class Countdown {
    constructor(counter, action) {
        this.dec = function dec() {
            if (counter < 1) return;
            counter--;
            if (counter === 0) {
                action();
            }
        }
    }
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();

通过命名约定的私有数据

class Countdown {
    constructor(counter, action) {
        this._counter = counter;
        this._action = action;
    }
    dec() {
        if (this._counter < 1) return;
        this._counter--;
        if (this._counter === 0) {
            this._action();
        }
    }
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();

通过WeakMaps的私有数据

const _counter = new WeakMap();
const _action = new WeakMap();
class Countdown {
    constructor(counter, action) {
        _counter.set(this, counter);
        _action.set(this, action);
    }
    dec() {
        let counter = _counter.get(this);
        if (counter < 1) return;
        counter--;
        _counter.set(this, counter);
        if (counter === 0) {
            _action.get(this)();
        }
    }
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();

通过符号的私有数据

const _counter = Symbol('counter');
const _action = Symbol('action');

class Countdown {
    constructor(counter, action) {
        this[_counter] = counter;
        this[_action] = action;
    }
    dec() {
        if (this[_counter] < 1) return;
        this[_counter]--;
        if (this[_counter] === 0) {
            this[_action]();
        }
    }
}
const c = new Countdown(2, () => {});
c.dec();
c.dec();

事实上，使用符号和代理是可能的。您可以使用类作用域中的符号，并在代理中设置两个陷阱:一个用于类原型，以便Reflect.ownKeys(实例)或Object。getOwnPropertySymbols不会泄露你的符号，另一个是构造函数本身，所以当调用new ClassName(attrs)时，返回的实例将被拦截，并有自己的属性符号被阻塞。 代码如下:

const Human = (function() { const pet = Symbol(); const greet = Symbol(); const Human = privatizeSymbolsInFn(function(name) { this.name = name; // public this[pet] = 'dog'; // private }); Human.prototype = privatizeSymbolsInObj({ [greet]() { // private return 'Hi there!'; }, revealSecrets() { console.log(this[greet]() + ` The pet is a ${this[pet]}`); } }); return Human; })(); const bob = new Human('Bob'); console.assert(bob instanceof Human); console.assert(Reflect.ownKeys(bob).length === 1) // only ['name'] console.assert(Reflect.ownKeys(Human.prototype).length === 1 ) // only ['revealSecrets'] // Setting up the traps inside proxies: function privatizeSymbolsInObj(target) { return new Proxy(target, { ownKeys: Object.getOwnPropertyNames }); } function privatizeSymbolsInFn(Class) { function construct(TargetClass, argsList) { const instance = new TargetClass(...argsList); return privatizeSymbolsInObj(instance); } return new Proxy(Class, { construct }); }

Reflect.ownKeys()是这样工作的:Object.getOwnPropertyNames(myObj).concat(Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(myObj))这就是为什么我们需要为这些对象设置一个陷阱。

答案是“不”。但是你可以像这样创建对属性的私有访问:

使用模块。模块中的所有内容都是私有的，除非使用export关键字将其设为公有。 在模块内部，使用函数闭包:http://www.kirupa.com/html5/closures_in_javascript.htm

(可以使用符号来确保隐私的建议在ES6规范的早期版本中是正确的，但现在不再是这样:https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2014-January/035604.html和https://stackoverflow.com/a/22280202/1282216。有关符号和隐私的详细讨论，请参阅:https://curiosity-driven.org/private-properties-in-javascript)

这段代码演示了私有和公共、静态和非静态、实例级和类级、变量、方法和属性。

https://codesandbox.io/s/class-demo-837bj

class Animal { static count = 0 // class static public static #ClassPriVar = 3 // class static private constructor(kind) { this.kind = kind // instance public property Animal.count++ let InstancePriVar = 'InstancePriVar: ' + kind // instance private constructor-var log(InstancePriVar) Animal.#ClassPriVar += 3 this.adhoc = 'adhoc' // instance public property w/out constructor- parameter } #PawCount = 4 // instance private var set Paws(newPawCount) { // instance public prop this.#PawCount = newPawCount } get Paws() { // instance public prop return this.#PawCount } get GetPriVar() { // instance public prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar } static get GetPriVarStat() { // class public prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar } PrintKind() { // instance public method log('kind: ' + this.kind) } ReturnKind() { // instance public function return this.kind } /* May be unsupported get #PrivMeth(){ // instance private prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar + ' Private Method' } static get #PrivMeth(){ // class private prop return Animal.#ClassPriVar + ' Private Method' } */ } function log(str) { console.log(str) } // TESTING log(Animal.count) // static, avail w/out instance log(Animal.GetPriVarStat) // static, avail w/out instance let A = new Animal('Cat') log(Animal.count + ': ' + A.kind) log(A.GetPriVar) A.PrintKind() A.Paws = 6 log('Paws: ' + A.Paws) log('ReturnKind: ' + A.ReturnKind()) log(A.adhoc) let B = new Animal('Dog') log(Animal.count + ': ' + B.kind) log(B.GetPriVar) log(A.GetPriVar) // returns same as B.GetPriVar. Acts like a class-level property, but called like an instance-level property. It's cuz non-stat fx requires instance. log('class: ' + Animal.GetPriVarStat) // undefined log('instance: ' + B.GetPriVarStat) // static class fx log(Animal.GetPriVar) // non-stat instance fx log(A.InstancePriVar) // private log(Animal.InstancePriVar) // private instance var log('PawCount: ' + A.PawCount) // private. Use getter /* log('PawCount: ' + A.#PawCount) // private. Use getter log('PawCount: ' + Animal.#PawCount) // Instance and private. Use getter */

我相信在构造函数中使用闭包是可能获得“两全其美”的。有两种变化:

所有数据成员都是私有的

函数myFunc() { console.log(' x的值:' + this.x); this.myPrivateFunc (); ｝ 函数myPrivateFunc() { console.log(' x的增强值:' +(此。X + 1)); ｝ 类测试{ 构造函数(){ Let internal = { X: 2， }; 内部的。myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(内部); 这一点。myFunc = myFunc.bind(内部); ｝ };

有些成员是私有的

注意:这确实很难看。如果您知道更好的解决方案，请编辑此回复。

function myFunc(priv, pub) { pub.y = 3; // The Test object now gets a member 'y' with value 3. console.log('Value of x: ' + priv.x); this.myPrivateFunc(); } function myPrivateFunc() { pub.z = 5; // The Test object now gets a member 'z' with value 3. console.log('Enhanced value of x: ' + (priv.x + 1)); } class Test { constructor() { let self = this; let internal = { x : 2, }; internal.myPrivateFunc = myPrivateFunc.bind(null, internal, self); this.myFunc = myFunc.bind(null, internal, self); } };

你可以试试这个https://www.npmjs.com/package/private-members

这个包将按实例保存成员。

const pvt = require('private-members');
const _ = pvt();

let Exemplo = (function () {    
    function Exemplo() {
        _(this).msg = "Minha Mensagem";
    }

    _().mensagem = function() {
        return _(this).msg;
    }

    Exemplo.prototype.showMsg = function () {
        let msg = _(this).mensagem();
        console.log(msg);
    };

    return Exemplo;
})();

module.exports = Exemplo;