用这种方法可以很容易地实现这一点

步骤,

Create a boolean variable in the state in the parent class. Update this when you want to call a function. Create a prop variable and assign the boolean variable. From the child component access that variable using props and execute the method you want by having an if condition. class Child extends Component { Method=()=>{ --Your method body-- } render() { return ( //check whether the variable has been updated or not if(this.props.updateMethod){ this.Method(); } ) } } class Parent extends Component { constructor(){ this.state={ callMethod:false } } render() { return ( //update state according to your requirement this.setState({ callMethod:true }} <Child updateMethod={this.state.callMethod}></Child> ); } }

https://facebook.github.io/react/tips/expose-component-functions.html 更多答案请参考这里调用React子组件上的方法

通过查看“reason”组件的引用，您正在破坏封装，如果不仔细检查使用该组件的所有位置，就不可能重构该组件。正因为如此，我们强烈建议将引用视为组件的私有，就像状态一样。

一般来说，数据应该通过道具沿着树向下传递。有一些例外情况(比如调用.focus()或触发一个不会真正“改变”状态的一次性动画)，但任何时候你要公开一个名为“set”的方法，道具通常是更好的选择。试着让内部输入组件担心它的大小和外观，这样它的祖先就不会担心。

如果你这样做只是因为你想让Child为它的父对象提供一个可重用的trait，那么你可以考虑使用render-props来代替。

这种技术实际上把结构颠倒过来了。Child现在包装了父对象，所以我将它重命名为AlertTrait。为了保持连续性，我保留了Parent这个名字，尽管它现在已经不是一个真正的Parent了。

// Use it like this:

  <AlertTrait renderComponent={Parent}/>


class AlertTrait extends Component {
  // You will need to bind this function, if it uses 'this'
  doAlert() {
    alert('clicked');
  }
  render() {
    return this.props.renderComponent({ doAlert: this.doAlert });
  }
}

class Parent extends Component {
  render() {
    return (
      <button onClick={this.props.doAlert}>Click</button>
    );
  }
}

在这种情况下，AlertTrait提供了一个或多个特征，它将这些特征作为道具传递给renderComponent道具中给定的任何组件。

Parent接收doAlert作为道具，并在需要时调用它。

(为了清晰起见，我在上面的例子中调用道具renderComponent。但在上面链接的React文档中，他们只称之为渲染。)

Trait组件可以在它的渲染函数中渲染父元素周围的东西，但它不渲染父元素内部的任何东西。实际上，如果它将另一个道具(例如renderChild)传递给父对象，父对象就可以在它的渲染方法中使用它，它就可以在父对象内部渲染东西。

这与OP要求的有些不同，但有些人可能会在这里结束(就像我们所做的那样)，因为他们想要创建一个可重用的trait，并且认为子组件是实现这一点的好方法。

对于功能组件，最简单的方法是

父组件

parent.tsx

import React, { useEffect, useState, useRef } from "react";
import child from "../../child"

const parent: React.FunctionComponent = () => {
  const childRef: any = useRef();
}

const onDropDownChange: any = (event): void => {
    const target = event.target;
    childRef.current.onFilterChange(target.value);
};

return <child ref={childRef} />

export default parent;

子组件

child.tsx

import React, {   useState,   useEffect,   forwardRef,   useRef,   useImperativeHandle, } from "react";

const Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
 useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({
    onFilterChange(id) {
      console.log("Value from parent", id)
    },
  }));
})

Child.displayName = "Child";

export default Child;

这里有个虫子?注意: 我同意rossipedia的解决方案使用forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle

网上有一些错误的信息说refs只能从React类组件创建，但如果你使用上面提到的钩子，你确实可以使用函数组件。注意，只有在我将文件更改为在导出组件时不使用withRouter()后，钩子才对我有效。例如，从

export default withRouter(TableConfig);

取而代之的是

export default TableConfig;

In hindsight the withRouter() is not needed for such a component anyway, but usually it doesn't hurt anything having it in. My use case is that I created a component to create a Table to handle the viewing and editing of config values, and I wanted to be able to tell this Child component to reset it's state values whenever the Parent form's Reset button was hit. UseRef() wouldn't properly get the ref or ref.current (kept on getting null) until I removed withRouter() from the file containing my child component TableConfig

I wasn't satisfied with any of the solutions presented here. There is actually a very simple solution that can be done using pure Javascript without relying upon some React functionality other than the basic props object - and it gives you the benefit of communicating in either direction (parent -> child, child -> parent). You need to pass an object from the parent component to the child component. This object is what I refer to as a "bi-directional reference" or biRef for short. Basically, the object contains a reference to methods in the parent that the parent wants to expose. And the child component attaches methods to the object that the parent can call. Something like this:

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      someParentFunction: someParentFunction
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef.someChildFunction = someChildFunction;

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

这种解决方案的另一个优点是，您可以在父节点和子节点中添加更多的函数，同时只使用一个属性将它们从父节点传递给子节点。

对上述代码的改进是不直接向biRef对象添加父函数和子函数，而是向子成员添加。父函数应该添加到名为“Parent”的成员中，而子函数应该添加到名为“child”的成员中。

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.child.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      parent: {
          someParentFunction: someParentFunction
      }
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.parent.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef {
       child: {
            someChildFunction: someChildFunction
       }
   }

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

通过将父函数和子函数放在biRef对象的独立成员中，您将在两者之间有一个清晰的分离，并且很容易看到哪个属于父函数或子函数。如果父组件和子组件中都出现了相同的函数，它还有助于防止子组件意外地覆盖父函数。

One last thing is that if you note, the parent component creates the biRef object with var whereas the child component accesses it through the props object. It might be tempting to not define the biRef object in the parent and access it from its parent through its own props parameter (which might be the case in a hierarchy of UI elements). This is risky because the child may think a function it is calling on the parent belongs to the parent when it might actually belong to a grandparent. There's nothing wrong with this as long as you are aware of it. Unless you have a reason for supporting some hierarchy beyond a parent/child relationship, it's best to create the biRef in your parent component.